What is so difficult for some to see that the quoted is the only point that matters in this whole debate?
Lets explore more deeply into Jones' schedule at Cincinnati
In 2010, he was 4-8
Wins over
Indiana State= 6-6
Miami OH= 9-3
Louisville= 6-6(brought up by many as a great accomplishment)
Rutgers= 4-8
Combined 25-24 record
Loses to
UConn= 8-4
Pitt= 7-5
W Virginia= 9-3
Syracuse= 7-5
USF= 7-5
Oklahoma= 11-2
North Carolina= 6-6
Fresno State= 7-5
Combined 62-35
2011, he was 9-3 regular season
Wins over
Austin Peay= 3-9
Akron= 1-11
NC State= 7-5
Miami OH= 4-8
Louisville= 7-5
USF= 5-7
Pitt= 6-6
Syracuse=5-7
UConn= 5-7
Combined 43-65
Loses to
Tennessee=5-7
Rutgers= 8-4
W Virginia= 9-3
Combined 22-14
2012, he was again 9-3
Wins over
Pitt=6-6
Delaware State= 6-6
Virginia Tech= 6-6(again brought up as great accomplishment)
Miami OH= 4-8
Fordham= 6-6
Syracuse= 7-5( shared 4 way tie for Big East Conference Championship)
Temple= 4-8
USF= 3-9
UConn=5-7
Combined 47-61
Loses against
Toledo= 9-3
Louisville= 10-2
Rutgers= 9-3
Combined 28-8
So, you see as the level of competition weakened, his overall record improved. Still not enough to win the Big East outright
His signature wins that everyone brings up were against Louisville and Virginia Tech, yet both teams were a combined 19-17 the two years he beat them.
Folks, no matter how you slice it, Jones benefited from an extremely weak schedule. Something he won't have the benefit of at UT.
For some of us, quite the contrary. We are arguing the demerits of both. Some are trying to use the comparison to claim the coaches did a good job this year and everything is fine and dandy with their ability to compete at the SEC level.Glad I have been too busy to get into this argument.
Seriously?
You guys are arguing the merits of a 6-7 season versus a 5-7 season?
Dooley ended up proving that. Jones has not. My concern is that he was at best "equal" to Dooley's first year in his first year.Here is a solution: they both sucked and neither should be considered acceptable at UT.
That's true. And he still has to win to keep that recruiting momentum going.Butch better hope this recruiting class is the salvation for all that woes Vol Nation like some on here think or his tenure may not last much longer than Dooley's.
This will be spun in just a matter of minutes. Good job on putting the numbers out there. It shows any reasonable person that they should be leery and take a wait and see approach before anointing Butch as the next Neyland.
Sorry to anyone if they thought I was saying Jones did better than Dools his 1st year so we should rejoice. Another poster earlier had said Dooley did better that Jones in his 1st year cuz he went to a bowl. I was merely pointing out that Dools didn't have to beat a ranked team to make a bowl. So that point was lame on his part. I didn't start comparing the schedules to say Jones is good or should get a pass, he brought it up.
5-7 is not acceptable but it is what most coaches would have ended up at.
You will also notice that in 3 years during the regular season, he only beat one team with more than 8 wins
Glad I have been too busy to get into this argument.
Seriously?
You guys are arguing the merits of a 6-7 season versus a 5-7 season?
Here is a solution: they both sucked and neither should be considered acceptable at UT.
Butch better hope this recruiting class is the salvation for all that woes Vol Nation like some on here think or his tenure may not last much longer than Dooley's.
Lets explore more deeply into Jones' schedule at Cincinnati
In 2010, he was 4-8
Wins over
Indiana State= 6-6
Miami OH= 9-3
Louisville= 6-6(brought up by many as a great accomplishment)
Rutgers= 4-8
Combined 25-24 record
Loses to
UConn= 8-4
Pitt= 7-5
W Virginia= 9-3
Syracuse= 7-5
USF= 7-5
Oklahoma= 11-2
North Carolina= 6-6
Fresno State= 7-5
Combined 62-35
2011, he was 9-3 regular season
Wins over
Austin Peay= 3-9
Akron= 1-11
NC State= 7-5
Miami OH= 4-8
Louisville= 7-5
USF= 5-7
Pitt= 6-6
Syracuse=5-7
UConn= 5-7
Combined 43-65
Loses to
Tennessee=5-7
Rutgers= 8-4
W Virginia= 9-3
Combined 22-14
2012, he was again 9-3
Wins over
Pitt=6-6
Delaware State= 6-6
Virginia Tech= 6-6(again brought up as great accomplishment)
Miami OH= 4-8
Fordham= 6-6
Syracuse= 7-5( shared 4 way tie for Big East Conference Championship)
Temple= 4-8
USF= 3-9
UConn=5-7
Combined 47-61
Loses against
Toledo= 9-3
Louisville= 10-2
Rutgers= 9-3
Combined 28-8
So, you see as the level of competition weakened, his overall record improved. Still not enough to win the Big East outright
His signature wins that everyone brings up were against Louisville and Virginia Tech, yet both teams were a combined 19-17 the two years he beat them.
Folks, no matter how you slice it, Jones benefited from an extremely weak schedule. Something he won't have the benefit of at UT.
Jones didn't have to beat a ranked team to make a bowl. We now know that UF was terrible and unworthy of being ranked. UGA is unlikely to finish ranked with the loss to Nebraska.
Personally, I think Butch did better than Dooley did his first year. I'll take a win over a top 10 team and an utterly embarrassing loss over just winning the games you are supposed to win and making a minor bowl and losing it.
But the fact that it's so close (not just between Butch's first year and Dooley's first year, but really between Butch's first year and even Dooley's worst year) is pretty scary.
Some athletic department is going to steal you from Taco Bell one of these days
Posted via VolNation Mobile
Not to pile on, but more first year factoids ....
CDD had only 65 scholarship players. CBJ had 83 iirc.
With about 15 days to recruit, CDD signed a top 10 class. With about 60 days to recruit, CBJ signed a top 30 class.
Glad someone else finally mentioned this. I wanted to earlier but got busy, and let's face it apparently I'm some some dummy that makes tacos for a living. Therefore it wouldn't mean anything from me.
The roster depletion dooley had to deal with was no joke. People complain how he didn't leave enough players but don't consider how far behind he had to replenish from. Having to kick off players for issues didn't help either. Then throw the NCAA penalties he had against him too. At no time did Dooley have the opportunity to sign anywhere near 30+ players.
Posted via VolNation Mobile