Alabama will be back!!! It just isn't logical for anyone to think that they can lose several junior classes to early entry to the N.F.L. and not eventually have it take a toll on their performance on the field.
Saban has not been giving enough playing time to his sophomores and freshmen lately. Then when the seniors and juniors leave due to graduation of the NFL, he has no real experienced players returning.
You will see Saban start to give sophomores & freshmen more playing time....
Yeah if u don't add Fulmer/Hammy/UT Administrators (recent past and present)/Big Boosters/Legion of the Misrable/Gruden/etc to that sex party u either have no clue what u r talking about, are really bias, or given the wrong room #. Just sayin...
Posted via VolNation Mobile
Just bickering over details and parsing everything a little too much I suspect. We probably conclude the same things but with differences in our reasons.
I actually believe that Jones will stay if he is able to succeed at UT.
Oh... and your list isn't complete without Cutcliffe on top. He proved this year what some of us have suspected for awhile. He, not Chavis or Fulmer, was the key ingredient when UT was most successful.
CBJ has done an excellent job in his first year as UT coach, especially when you factor in the potential 2014 signing class. He seems very well respected throughout college football. With that being said, do you think Penn State's national search committee will reach out to CBJ? I have read that James Franklin is high on their list. I think CBJ would not interview even if contacted, but it might be even more positive national exposure if CBJ was contacted and turned down the interview. What do you guys think?
His first year at UT is now part of his track record. It was a subpar performance and underachievement of the talent on the roster.2. Did Jones' Tennessee squad go 5-7 this year? Yes. Was I happy with it? Hell no. That being said, some of you guys are way out of touch with reality. You hire a coach based on his previous track record, not what you think he might do in the first year.
And it means absolutely NOTHING when a coach steps up into the SEC. The resume gets him the job... but only what happens after that counts toward keeping it.It's called a body of work.
The only mouth breathers here are those who keep throwing this red herring out. Who has called for his head after one year? Some of us have our eyes open and recognize that it was NOT a good start... that does not mean we are interested in making a final judgment before year 3.Hart didn't hire Jones because he went 4-8 his first year at Cincy, he hired him because he turned that 4-8 unit into a team that won 10 games two years in a row. He's gonna need more than one year before the mouth breathers start calling for his head.
No. If you look at the record you will find that he succeeded in two conferences with nowhere near the level of competition he will face in the SEC. The combined records of the teams he faced at Cincy was around 40% wins. He won't see that at UT.Just look at his past record. The proof is there.
Mentioned... not called apparently. The O was not worse than the D. The D was the second worse scoring D (behind Sunseri's disaster) in at least 70 years. This was NOT the worst D talent UT has had during that period. It was the first time since the 1920's that UT was beaten by 4 opponents by a margin of 28+ pts.3. Previous case in point: Mike B's offense, with the exception of some incredibly clutch plays by Marquez North and Coach G's total reinvention of Raijon Neal, was the worst unit on Tennessee's team this year. Even the defense was better. Yet Bajakian and Azzanni were both mentioned for head coaching jobs this offseason. After a 5-7 season!
The only body of work that counts anymore is what they do and have done at UT.Again, it's called a body of work.
4. Jones - 1. Spurrier - 0. This should speak for itself.
His first year at UT is now part of his track record. It was a subpar performance and underachievement of the talent on the roster.
And it means absolutely NOTHING when a coach steps up into the SEC. The resume gets him the job... but only what happens after that counts toward keeping it.
The only mouth breathers here are those who keep throwing this red herring out. Who has called for his head after one year? Some of us have our eyes open and recognize that it was NOT a good start... that does not mean we are interested in making a final judgment before year 3.
No. If you look at the record you will find that he succeeded in two conferences with nowhere near the level of competition he will face in the SEC. The combined records of the teams he faced at Cincy was around 40% wins. He won't see that at UT.
Mentioned... not called apparently. The O was not worse than the D. The D was the second worse scoring D (behind Sunseri's disaster) in at least 70 years. This was NOT the worst D talent UT has had during that period. It was the first time since the 1920's that UT was beaten by 4 opponents by a margin of 28+ pts.
The only body of work that counts anymore is what they do and have done at UT.
Tell you what. Take a job that challenges your skill level then anytime anyone points to a failure or shortcoming... direct them back to the resume you used to get the job. That should work well for you.
It would if he had not lost to the worst UF team in decades, needed a last minute INT to beat USA, lost to Vandy, and lost 4 games by blowout. Against that backdrop... the win against Spurrier is the exception... not a rule.
Nah....wanna laugh?? I saw writers on a site (rhymes with Shmortsline.com) saying that Franklin was the leading candidate to take over the Cleveland Browns job.