n_huffhines
What's it gonna cost?
- Joined
- Mar 11, 2009
- Messages
- 87,335
- Likes
- 52,507
Witnesses to what? Did they see the assault and say they could tell the assault was fake? Who are they? Or has everybody just taken the police's word for it?
Witness testimony falls apart all the time. Eye witness evidence isn't extremely reliable, even if the witness seems credible.
Allegedly the smoking gun in the case seemed to be the check Smollett had written for over 3 grand. If that wasn't a pay off then how else was it explained in the case?
Witnesses to what? Did they see the assault and say they could tell the assault was fake? Who are they? Or has everybody just taken the police's word for it?
Witness testimony falls apart all the time. Eye witness evidence isn't extremely reliable, even if the witness seems credible.
The fact that it was a hoax perpetrated by Smollet came to light in his statements made to police (contradictory and clearly false) during the investigation, video surveillance of two brothers purchasing red hats and rope at a hardware store as well as their admission they were paid by Smollet to purchase said items and fake the attack, a check signed by Smollet paid to the brothers, among other evidence.
I'm guessing (pure speculation) that there was pressure to drop the charges from "higher up" and there was some police misconduct (maybe via public statements) that was deemed a sufficient excuse to yield to the pressure to drop.
Sorry had to be succinctWitnesses to what? Did they see the assault and say they could tell the assault was fake? Who are they? Or has everybody just taken the police's word for it?
Witness testimony falls apart all the time. Eye witness evidence isn't extremely reliable, even if the witness seems credible.
There were no witness to the alleged assault. The witnesses are the 2 dudes who allegedly participated. I don't even think security cameras picked up the alleged assault.
I mean, the two Nigerian brothers admitted they were the "attackers" which completely flies in the face of two white guys shouting "this is MAGA country", so I'd say it's a bit more than that.Ok, so the whole case was just a he said/they said story to which there was no obvious evidence to conclude one way or the other.