Vol67
Senior Member
- Joined
- Jul 10, 2004
- Messages
- 7,046
- Likes
- 1,682
Because I compared him to Willingham? That is ridiculous. Willingham's players "played hard for him" and "he can get better athletes at Notre Dame".This post is just steeped in racism. Sickening.
Strong supporters are hell bent on ignoring facts about his league and his record and defending the guy....Hope they enjoy him at UL for another year
Strong supporters are hell bent on ignoring facts about his league and his record and defending the guy....Hope they enjoy him at UL for another year
Just not convinced Strong is a homerun.
Yeah he didn't do anything at UF nor at South Carolina and has done zero at Louisville. Louisville was a program that was worse off than UT is right now and he has breathed life back into it. But yeah he's done nothing so let's pass.
We can get NCAA probate Tressel, How about Butch Davis who has left 2 college program under a cloud or how about Petrino who has done just about everything wrong that can be done. or Jimbo Fisher who cannot win in the SEC.
Realistic choices are
Strong
Fedora
Grundy
It is just a simple test to analyze the numbers. There are an enormous amount of extrinsic factors that go into success in college football. You do not automatically win football games if you pick a coach off list #1, there are some stinkers on there. The point is you are far more likely to have great success with a coach who has won 9 games twice previously or a coordinator who becomes your head coach than with a guy who has tried head coaching and not won at least 9 for two years.Let's split group 2 down a little bit
Trending up at their previous stop:
Charlie Strong
Al Golden
Trending down or holding steady at their previous stop:
Derek Dooley
Gene Chizik
Lane Kiffin
Bill Callahan
Gerry DiNardo
Improving from prior coach, but not maintaining a steady upward trend:
Tommy Tuberville
Tyrone Willingham
List looks different now, doesn't it?
Yep. They were slamming him when Louisville was undefeated and ranked 16th.
Some people are lousy at hiding their racism.
It is just a simple test to analyze the numbers. There are an enormous amount of extrinsic factors that go into success in college football. You do not automatically win football games if you pick a coach off list #1, there are some stinkers on there. The point is you are far more likely to have great success with a coach who has won 9 games twice previously or a coordinator who becomes your head coach than with a guy who has tried head coaching and not won at least 9 for two years.
Strong may be great, but he smacks to me of the flavor of the month. If you eliminate Fedora, Golden, Strong, Franklin with the 9 win test, and Tressell and Petrino with the Dave Hart Integrity test, you are left with a much more viable list of candidates.
I don't know how you turned "not sure he is a homerun" into "he has never done anything, and he will suck forever". I think you were just looking for somebody to jump on, and you found me. Gongrats. Nothing you said has convinced me that Strong could come in and be competing with Saban in 3 years time.
Thanks for going into such detail about why you think so. Willingham won Pac 10 Coach of the Year twice; Strong supporters have pointed out he has already won it and may again.The Tyrone and Strong comparison is one of the dumber things I have read today.
I think he's in the same class as Sumlin, Saban is not untouchable but it'll take a little longer to get there, UT does not have SEC speed on defense plus things have to change with the administration or no coach will win at UT but I think he is the best option to get UT there and he is the best shot at saving this recruiting class which would set UT back even farther.
Strong gets you into The Carolina's, Georgia, Florida, and Alabama. He'll also connect with the Tennessee High School coaches quickly
Thanks for going into such detail about why you think so. Willingham won Pac 10 Coach of the Year twice; Strong supporters have pointed out he has already won it and may again.
There is no sure thing. If you have your guy you like, you have your guy. Fisher, Gundy, and Shaw have less risk imo.
Thanks for going into such detail about why you think so. Willingham won Pac 10 Coach of the Year twice; Strong supporters have pointed out he has already won it and may again.
There is no sure thing. If you have your guy you like, you have your guy. Fisher, Gundy, and Shaw have less risk imo.
Gundy and Shaw I'm with you.
Fisher to me has just as much or more risk. All Fisher has proven is that he can recruit SEC talent to Florida State. Well awesome, that's not that hard. He's struggled to beat teams that are on his level talent-wise, and has lost to some teams that aren't. I fully expect he'd recruit well at Tennessee, but as a game coach, I'm very skeptical.
Strong is known as a good recruiter and would also recruit well at Tennessee. Possibly better than Fisher, but at least well enough to compete. As far as game-coaching, while he has had a couple bad losses, he's had fewer than Fisher, and he's had more overachieving wins. He's exceeded preseason expectations in all three years at Louisville, something Fisher has done exactly once in three years at FSU. So while they're both unproven to some degree, Strong has shown more ability to exceed expectations as a game coach.
I think you are mixing up two different posters. The goal is to win the SEC and put yourself in a likely position to go to the NC game. Which of the following lists would you rather choose a coach from if you had the choice?
1
Urban Meyer
Nick Saban
Brian Kelly
Rich Rodriguez
Jim Tressel
Mack Brown
Brady Hoke
Jim Donnan
Mike Price
Pete Carroll
Dennis Franchione
2
Charlie Strong
Al Golden
Derek Dooley
Gene Chizik
Lane Kiffin
Bill Callahan
Tyrone Willingham
Tommy Tuberville
Gerry DiNardo