To continue the thought, it seems counterproductive too. You have a salary pool for assistants, but unless your spouse is a great coach, it's not going to contribute to your success nearly as much as hiring a great coach with the same money.And I think that's just nepotism in general. Some people can't stand it, and in some cases rightfully so. This falls somewhere between "my child is carrying on the family business" (perfectly ok) to "we're getting rare contracts and hiring my wife too" (usually very inappropriate).
definitely some legit concerns. But I still don't think it should automatically keep us away from the 'right' hire. we've been down that road before.To continue the thought, it seems counterproductive too. You have a salary pool for assistants, but unless your spouse is a great coach, it's not going to contribute to your success nearly as much as hiring a great coach with the same money.
I didn’t really ever have a problem with the nepotism; however, having a spouse on staff when you have two younger kids at home seems like it could put you at a disadvantage in recruiting. You can’t both be on the road at the same time because someone has to stay home and watch the kids. Grandparents or a sitter can step in some, but these days it seems like recruiting is an all the time thing. With Vic and Blair, they could both hypothetically be on the road to recruit at the same time. I don’t think Curry has young kids at home, and I honestly don’t know about the Fortier family. Just an interesting hurdle that popped in my mind.Much as I've defended Jon, and I really do think he's been an unfair target for a bunch of men who can't stand Daddy working for Mama, the problems with a family package deal are obvious. Espec at departure time.
But my question is can we use no families as a hard and fast restriction when it's a growing thing across WBB? Can't hire Vic bc of Blair? I've always thought if the AD can work thru it so can I.
Employees until new staff hired. They are expected to still work, recruit etc. Hard to do under the circumstances, but still getting paid.Curious, have Coach Sam and Joy been terminated as well? Their online handles still have UT and their titles, was just wondering if the entire staff was terminated.
That’s not true, many here wanted to know what he brings to the staff to make us better. Duplicate position coach who doesn’t recruit. Was he over game prep, film…what does he do great?Much as I've defended Jon, and I really do think he's been an unfair target for a bunch of men who can't stand Daddy working for Mama, the problems with a family package deal are obvious. Espec at departure time.
But my question is can we use no families as a hard and fast restriction when it's a growing thing across WBB? Can't hire Vic bc of Blair? I've always thought if the AD can work thru it so can I.
Nannies and Grannys. These folks make lots of money, can afford full time nannys. Pat's nanny was very much a family member,I didn’t really ever have a problem with the nepotism; however, having a spouse on staff when you have two younger kids at home seems like it could put you at a disadvantage in recruiting. You can’t both be on the road at the same time because someone has to stay home and watch the kids. Grandparents or a sitter can step in some, but these days it seems like recruiting is an all the time thing. With Vic and Blair, they could both hypothetically be on the road to recruit at the same time. I don’t think Curry has young kids at home, and I honestly don’t know about the Fortier family. Just an interesting hurdle that popped in my mind.
To continue the thought, it seems counterproductive too. You have a salary pool for assistants, but unless your spouse is a great coach, it's not going to contribute to your success nearly as much as hiring a great coach with the same money.
Yeah, after finishing out her freshman year and then playing her entire sophomore year. But the pearl clutching contingent here seemed to overlook her alcohol fueled escapades, but acting like Kamila and Angel are the devil incarnate for their on-court infractions.And Miles was asked to leave...
Yeah, I mentioned sitters and grandparents. I can’t remember when the divorce occurred with Pat exactly, but Tyler did have at least one parent home. It’s got to be tough as parents to feel like your kids don’t have either parent at home for months.Nannies and Grannys. These folks make lots of money, can afford full time nannys. Pat's nanny was very much a family member,
If he had more concrete qualifications besides "CHO", then he probably wouldn't have gotten as much heat (example would be Shea Ralph's husband). I don't mind nepotism if the family hire actually meets the qualifications.Much as I've defended Jon, and I really do think he's been an unfair target for a bunch of men who can't stand Daddy working for Mama, the problems with a family package deal are obvious. Espec at departure time.
But my question is can we use no families as a hard and fast restriction when it's a growing thing across WBB? Can't hire Vic bc of Blair? I've always thought if the AD can work thru it so can I.
LOL, pretty sure some would argue whether RB was actually "at home" or not.Yeah, I mentioned sitters and grandparents. I can’t remember when the divorce occurred with Pat exactly, but Tyler did have at least one parent home. It’s got to be tough as parents to feel like your kids don’t have either parent at home for months.
Yeah, I mentioned sitters and grandparents. I can’t remember when the divorce occurred with Pat exactly, but Tyler did have at least one parent home. It’s got to be tough as parents to feel like your kids don’t have either parent at home for months.
Yeah, I’m not gonna get anywhere near RB…LOL, pretty sure some would argue whether RB was actually "at home" or not.
The counterargument, and the one most wife/hubby duos make, is that it actually keeps young families together if both spouses want to coach. If they coached different places, one would literally never see their kids.
All water under the bridge, the Harpers are gone.
For sure when they were both in Knoxville in season and could have the kids with them always. I wonder if they had the kids tag along in recruiting visits and tournament circuits? I think Tyler tagged along some. If they were constantly with them during recruiting season then no issue at all. If the kids had sports or activities in the summer, it gets harder. In any case as glv said “water under the bridge”RB worked in banking. I think Tyler was with Pat most all the time.
I believe the Harper’s were similar in that the kids were generally included and not excluded in things like that.
Some players and families love that and are looking for that “family feel.” Then you have players like some of her former Mo State players who indicated they felt more like babysitters than college basketball players.
Correct, i think he sent feelers out after the tournament and got a good positive feedback from who he wants. This shouldnt take long imo.I don’t think DW makes a move like this a week after the season ends unless he has someone else already lined up. I expect an announcement by the end of the week.
John Adams was in the bunch of people That believe Kellie was not going to get it done.You've been hanging around glv's support group too much.
I've never read that from a former player.Can you pull up that quote please?RB worked in banking. I think Tyler was with Pat most all the time.
I believe the Harper’s were similar in that the kids were generally included and not excluded in things like that.
Some players and families love that and are looking for that “family feel.” Then you have players like some of her former Mo State players who indicated they felt more like babysitters than college basketball players.
True, and probably why Jon didn't on road recruit.Yeah, I’m not gonna get anywhere near RB…
I think the counterargument is true for in season, but not sure it would be for offseason recruiting. If both were on the road during this time, it would be the same principle of never seeing their kids.
RB worked in banking. I think Tyler was with Pat most all the time.
I believe the Harper’s were similar in that the kids were generally included and not excluded in things like that.
Some players and families love that and are looking for that “family feel.” Then you have players like some of her former Mo State players who indicated they felt more like babysitters than college basketball players.