Cohen likely to cooperate with prosecution

Poor Marilyn.

The DNC really knows how to keep people quiet. Just ask anyone that has dirt on the Clintons.


Whoops, I forgot. You can’t.

Difference is, you can more or less wipe the dirt off the clinton's with a firehose. With trump, even a vat of clorox and a chisel and hammer wouldn't be successful.
 
  • Like
Reactions: zeppelin128
Your post sounds very Orwellian

“What you’re seeing and what you’re reading is not what’s happening,” Trump told a gathering of the Veterans of Foreign Wars on Tuesday.

Who sounds Orwellian again?

“The party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command,” Orwell wrote.
 
“What you’re seeing and what you’re reading is not what’s happening,” Trump told a gathering of the Veterans of Foreign Wars on Tuesday.

Who sounds Orwellian again?

“The party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command,” Orwell wrote.

Sorry if you dont understand what I meant.
 
Difference is, you can more or less wipe the dirt off the clinton's with a firehose. With trump, even a vat of clorox and a chisel and hammer wouldn't be successful.

BS. I'm not saying Trump isn't corrupt. I'm sure he has plenty of skeletons in the closet. But acting as if the Clintons aren't dirty as hell is pure fiction. They are the most corrupt politicians of this generation. With all of their allies protecting them, nothing has really stuck, but anyone with common sense and no political slant knows they're guilty as hell. Especially Hillary. Both the left and the right like to pretend their **** don't stink, but those of us in the middle know it stinks to high hell.

I have no doubt Trump has done bad things. But I don't think he "colluded" with Russia. And thus far, Mueller has yet to produce evidence that he has. For all the dirt he's digging up, none of it has to do with "collusion". And while the left seems to be enjoying the **** show now, I can't help but wonder how they will feel when subjected to the same standards? Precedent is being set on how far one can go to unseat a sitting President, and I don't think it paints a bright future for anyone who should win the office. As much as you may dislike Trump, these kind of investigations becoming the new norm will hinder our country. And don't be foolish and believe this is a one time thing. The parties will continue these tactics to try and undercut each other when the other is in power. And when arguments are made to oppose such investigations, all they will ever have to do is point back to this investigation to justify how far they are willing to go.

I've never been against impeaching Trump if it could be proven he was complicit with the actions of Russia. But from the beginning, I've been against Mueller having free reign to dig into Trump's past with impunity. The investigation should have had set limits, not to protect Trump, but to protect justice. Mueller may very well bring Trump down, but will the long term consequences be worth it? I don't think so. It would have been much more judicious to let him serve his term, then run a better candidate against him. The problem of the left is they still fail to recognize their biggest mistake was running Hillary. It speaks volumes that when all was said and done, the American people saw Trump as the lesser of two evils.
 
Difference is, you can more or less wipe the dirt off the clinton's with a firehose. With trump, even a vat of clorox and a chisel and hammer wouldn't be successful.

You obviously know very little about the Clintons. You claim to not be left leaning but this post shows you clearly are. And before you say it, I fully realize that the Clintons are untouchables. Even when they commit felonies, they have never been prosecuted. I mean you have mentioned moral character. Surely you cannot believe the Clintons have any.
 
That's his schtick, posting videos nobody watches. Stick around and see the ones of the leather hippie who lives in mama's basement.

Whats wrong with the video? You seem to imply that the video is just total BS. Why? Is it just because it seems to shed a negative light kn Davis and Cohen? If this video were praising Davis and Cohen, would you have watched it?
 
You obviously know very little about the Clintons. You claim to not be left leaning but this post shows you clearly are. And before you say it, I fully realize that the Clintons are untouchables. Even when they commit felonies, they have never been prosecuted. I mean you have mentioned moral character. Surely you cannot believe the Clintons have any.

IDGAF about the clintons. They are the past and you goobers can’t stop chanting “lock her up.” What I care about is trump mesmerizing your lot into defending the indefensible.

He is without a doubt the most corrupt, morally bankrupt individual to hold the office of the presidency.
 
  • Like
Reactions: zeppelin128
BS. I'm not saying Trump isn't corrupt. I'm sure he has plenty of skeletons in the closet. But acting as if the Clintons aren't dirty as hell is pure fiction. They are the most corrupt politicians of this generation. With all of their allies protecting them, nothing has really stuck, but anyone with common sense and no political slant knows they're guilty as hell. Especially Hillary. Both the left and the right like to pretend their **** don't stink, but those of us in the middle know it stinks to high hell.

I have no doubt Trump has done bad things. But I don't think he "colluded" with Russia. And thus far, Mueller has yet to produce evidence that he has. For all the dirt he's digging up, none of it has to do with "collusion". And while the left seems to be enjoying the **** show now, I can't help but wonder how they will feel when subjected to the same standards? Precedent is being set on how far one can go to unseat a sitting President, and I don't think it paints a bright future for anyone who should win the office. As much as you may dislike Trump, these kind of investigations becoming the new norm will hinder our country. And don't be foolish and believe this is a one time thing. The parties will continue these tactics to try and undercut each other when the other is in power. And when arguments are made to oppose such investigations, all they will ever have to do is point back to this investigation to justify how far they are willing to go.

I've never been against impeaching Trump if it could be proven he was complicit with the actions of Russia. But from the beginning, I've been against Mueller having free reign to dig into Trump's past with impunity. The investigation should have had set limits, not to protect Trump, but to protect justice. Mueller may very well bring Trump down, but will the long term consequences be worth it? I don't think so. It would have been much more judicious to let him serve his term, then run a better candidate against him. The problem of the left is they still fail to recognize their biggest mistake was running Hillary. It speaks volumes that when all was said and done, the American people saw Trump as the lesser of two evils.

I would rather trump be voted out of office than impeached. Much better for a democracy.

But...

Is it really so hard to believe that a man with his lack or moral character wouldn’t accept the help of another nation state to “win” given how important “winning” is to him?

Mueller is many steps ahead of trump. Smart and calculated beats an erratic bulley every time.
 
IDGAF about the clintons. They are the past and you goobers can’t stop chanting “lock her up.” What I care about is trump mesmerizing your lot into defending the indefensible.

He is without a doubt the most corrupt, morally bankrupt individual to hold the office of the presidency.


Naw. He’s just more of the same
 
  • Like
Reactions: NorthDallas40


Cohen would be picked apart on this, regardless. After denying any knowledge in his congressional testimony, changing the story, now, will not be given much credence.

I do get a feeling though, even if he hard proof of Trump's knowledge of the meeting, the narrative would morph into, "So, what?".
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mick
Cohen would be picked apart on this, regardless. After denying any knowledge in his congressional testimony, changing the story, now, will not be given much credence.

I do get a feeling though, even if he hard proof of Trump's knowledge of the meeting, the narrative would morph into, "So, what?".


I honestly don’t care.
Nothing Trump has done so far.....if every accusation is true......is no different than every other president before.

So yeah....so what.
 

VN Store



Back
Top