- Joined
- Jul 7, 2008
- Messages
- 88,479
- Likes
- 37,040
I have always loved watching the late night PAC12 games in Pullman and Corvallis . Those places still had that college town feel to them, whereas the other schools in the PAC 12 didn’t really seem that enthusiastic. Oregon and Washington are two great venues that are also enthusiastic, but I always liked those places .I can't find the tweet. but a Wazzu reporter posted about Wash. St and the decline of their sports program due to all the realignment.
I feel bad for schools like that..............
Can't personally speak to where the SEC Network is available throughout the country, but I get the Longhorn, Big 10 and Pac 10 networks in North Carolina. Seems like the conference networks are pretty much nationwide.
Time will tell. Yarmark should have let Utah dangle for a month or two. Learn a little humility along the way. Utah would have been there anyway. They have no other place to go.They’re probably feeling pretty good, considering they’re one of the best teams in conference.
It doesn’t for streaming and geography will mean even less with the fall of broadcast over the air TV. Geography will have some meaning just not as much as today.FSU and Clemson each have an average of 2 million viewers per game in the fall. That puts them in the top half of the SEC schools for viewers.
Does it really matter where those viewers are?
If FSU is a canary in the Coal Mine, it might be the Energia Asset Management Conference, with the HSBC Global Division and Renaissance Technologies Division,My OCD will require renaming all conferences to something generic.
Their lottery is being in both the NYC and NJ TV Market. Nothing else. No other P5 team there.Rutgers AD and President deserve a lifetime contract. The fact they were able to get in the Big Ten when it’s clear that their AD could have been relegated to Big East bball or like the AAC and lost millions upon millions is incredible. What an awesome play by them.
We already have Hugh Freeze, so there would be two.I hate playing VT. No win situation. No credit for winning and it's embarrassing not to win. Would feel cringy to have Clemson in our league. These teams are also in our recruiting territory: why give them unearned status? Imagining holy fake Dabo at SEC Media week makes me want to puke.
Either would be awesome, because I already have both.Deep pocket Apple and Amazon are about to call on the red phone, SEC time to take the call.
the SEC should add UNC & UVA.
Two elite Southern Universities that are the model of what all southern schools should aspire to be. It fills out the conference nicely. They’re prestigious, we’re already so far of everyone else in pretty much football and baseball, adding two solid basketball schools with football potential and tremendous academics while keeping our biggest rival—the big ten—at bay—is the best strategic move for the SEC.
Found it
On the ROKU the Roku app has live tv that also offers the PAC 12 channel free.Oddly enough, I live in Texas outside Dallas. We didn't get the Longhorn Network until like 2015 lol. For a thing that such a hubbub was made about, it just never really took off.
Can't imagine trying to fill a 24/7 schedule with content from one school. SEC Network barely gets any use outside of football season.
I cut my cable a few months ago, but I seem to be pretty well set up for football season
ESPN plus
SEC Network
B10 network
ACC network
Somehow, I will have to fill my viewing hours without the Pac-12 err 4 network.
Thanks for posting.
When the "culling out" occurs and the elite are all grouped and playing, the big losers are the OOC little schools who've taken their 50-60 burger for that big, program floating payday.Thanks for posting.
It even points out this plundering of conferences isn't over by a long shot.
Why have the marginal programs in Super Conferences?
Why should Vandy get the same base payout as UT?
How long before tOSU refuses to accept the same cut Indiana receives?
Why even have these teams in the Super Conferences?
The networks aren't going to feature the Wakes, Indianas, Purdues, and Mizzous on prime time or feature games. They are rarely competitive, and do not draw viewers.
They can be exchanged for the better teams in the lower conferences.
Why say "football has" instead of naming the top B1G whoevers and PAC rats? This is a general trend, I notice. It's like the media is trying to cover for USC, Oregon, Ohio State, Pedo St., Michigan, et. al.
Did you miss the SEC poaching aTm and Miz years ago and TX and OU recently? C'mon......Why say "football has" instead of naming the top B1G whoevers and PAC rats? This is a general trend, I notice. It's like the media is trying to cover for USC, Oregon, Ohio State, Pedo St., Michigan, et. al.
Also, NO to a salary cap. That would return everything to whoever cheats with impunity enjoys an unlevel playing field. I want that finished for good.
No, let's stay at 16 and stay the conference of champions!Let’s just make the Big Ten and SEC 32 teams each, play 15 conference games, 12 team playoff in each conference (top 4 teams get byes) and then SEC/Big Ten winners play each and winner gets to be the national champion