lawgator1
Senior Member
- Joined
- Aug 8, 2005
- Messages
- 72,756
- Likes
- 42,931
I've already brought that up and been ignored. It's fine to agree or disagree with her policy positions and even call her a hypocrite, but comparing her to Palin and labeling her as a moron is just a sad attempt to marginalize her rather than confront her positions.If she's such a moron why was she hired by the US Treasury to protect them from tax cheats?
I've already brought that up and been ignored. It's fine to agree or disagree with her policy positions and even call her a hypocrite, but comparing her to Palin and labeling her as a moron is just a sad attempt to marginalize her rather than confront her positions.
I believe I said she's way smarter than Palin.
And that's not really the issue, anyway. Its not raw smarts, or IQ. Its a willingness to harp on something as "socialist" when she presumably doesn't know what the word means.
(I say presumably because, if she does know, then one must naturally ask why she's a part owner of a farm that takes significant subsidies).
(I say presumably because, if she does know, then one must naturally ask why she's a part owner of a farm that takes significant subsidies).
I believe I said she's way smarter than Palin.
And that's not really the issue, anyway. Its not raw smarts, or IQ. Its a willingness to harp on something as "socialist" when she presumably doesn't know what the word means.
(I say presumably because, if she does know, then one must naturally ask why she's a part owner of a farm that takes significant subsidies).
By that definition, sir, Obama care is not the least bit socialist.
I've already brought that up and been ignored. It's fine to agree or disagree with her policy positions and even call her a hypocrite, but comparing her to Palin and labeling her as a moron is just a sad attempt to marginalize her rather than confront her positions.
I believe I said she's way smarter than Palin.
And that's not really the issue, anyway. Its not raw smarts, or IQ. Its a willingness to harp on something as "socialist" when she presumably doesn't know what the word means.
(I say presumably because, if she does know, then one must naturally ask why she's a part owner of a farm that takes significant subsidies).
I'm not sure when ignorance suddenly became in vogue, but after 8 years of Dubya, hopefully voters have seen the light, and recognize how potentially dangerous it is to elect a leader who couldn't pass 3rd grade history to the world's most powerful office.
Dictatorship?
I gotta make a comment about your pic and it in no way is a shot at you. Just a thought.
Many people don't know this but castro wears not one, but two Rolex at the same time.
If this was a banker the outcry would be loud.
I gotta make a comment about your pic and it in no way is a shot at you. Just a thought.
Many people don't know this but castro wears not one, but two Rolex at the same time.
If this was a banker the outcry would be loud.
I'll be honest, I never saw two Rolex watches. Does he wear them on the same arm?
Castro, you know, during the early land redistribution era, nationalized his own lands. His mother stayed in the house until she died (which was soon after the Revolution, I believe), and then a peasant family received it.
Just sayin' :hi:
The more I look back at the last half decade of the 20th, the more Castro stands out as an anti-hero. History has indeed absolved him.
Feel free to make suggestions for the future. I've been rotating them frequently as of late.