Congress Criminal Referral Clinton, Comey, McCabe, Lynch, Strzok, and Page to DOJ

[Orange_Vol1321]

You’re a weird girl

It's ma'am.

 

[lawgator1]

"at least 17 significant errors or omissions.” In the real world these are known as lies

Well, then the Dems only have 53,288 more to go to catch up to Trump.

 

[ajvol01]

Ouch

 

[Mick]

"at least 17 significant errors or omissions.” In the real world these are known as lies

Should we wait on those indictments or go ahead and laugh at you?

 

[volfanjustin]

Well, then the Dems only have 53,288 more to go to catch up to Trump.

The hacks on your side lie thousands of times a day over this fake impeachment crap alone

 

[hog88]

So to recap.
Impeachment: justifiably moving forward.
Mueller investigation: justified and no signs of bias.

Does that sum it up?

No

 

[luthervol]

Ouch

LOL...
What was it, 1000 US attorneys who disagreed with Barr's interpretation of the Mueller report?

 

[1972 Grad]

Ouch

But, but.......Mick said nobody cares what Durham thinks.

 

[volfanjustin]

Should we wait on those indictments or go ahead and laugh at you?

Deep staters watch out for each other, dems/socialists are above the law. There won't be any indictments

 

[NorthDallas40]

US Attorney Durham objects to IG findings on Russia probe origins in stunning statement

US Attorney Durham objects to IG findings on Russia probe origins in stunning statement

 

[BowlBrother85]

Ouch

...but Durham really needed something stronger than this from Horowitz. Horowitz's conclusions guarantee that this never leaves the partisan bickering stage. The same as impeachment.

 

[luthervol]

US Attorney Durham objects to IG findings on Russia probe origins in stunning statement

US Attorney Durham objects to IG findings on Russia probe origins in stunning statement

Stunning????? LOL.....
How many US Attorney's objected to Barr's interpretation of the Mueller report? 1000?
1000 > 1

 

[BowlBrother85]

But, but.......Mick said nobody cares what Durham thinks.

Without a consensus from Horowitz? What Durham thinks doesn't mean $hit.

 

[volfanjustin]

Stunning????? LOL.....
How many US Attorney's objected to Barr's interpretation of the Mueller report? 1000?
1000 > 1

You mean the bias partisan Weismann report?

 

[evillawyer]

 

[Mick]

Ouch

Funny, now that your "star" Horowitz exonerated the "Deep State", you think Durham has the goods.

 

[TN Ribs]

So the report clearly states that the start of the investigation was unbiased and warranted which completely undercuts Trump and his supporter's talking point. It's on to the next hair-brained conspiracy theory for Trump and his sycophants to distract the base from the truth.

 

[1972 Grad]

Without a consensus from Horowitz? What Durham thinks doesn't mean $hit.

Am I wrong, or does Horowitz have access to government employees only, whereas Durham can go anywhere and convene grand juries, etc.? That would seem to make quite a difference in what one can conclude versus the other.

 

[37L1]

Am I wrong, or does Horowitz have access to government employees, whereas Durham can go anywhere and convene grand juries, etc.? That would seem to make quite a difference in what one can conclude versus the other.

My understanding is that Horowitz does not have the ability to subpoena or compel anyone, his ability to get statements only pertains to current government employees. Durham can subpoena and compel just about anyone he needs to. He also has the power to convene a Grand Jury and seek indictments.

 

[VolnJC]

This report raises more questions than it does in answering
Why did Clapper lie?
Why did the FBI keep surveillance going even when it was determined to be wrong?
Why wasn't Trump notified of being cleared?
Who was Steele's source?

 

[BowlBrother85]

Am I wrong, or does Horowitz have access to government employees only, whereas Durham can go anywhere and convene grand juries, etc.? That would seem to make quite a difference in what one can conclude versus the other.

Durham can keep it in the partisan bickering stage for a while but he really needed Horowitz to confirm some bias to keep it going. There will be some reforms made within the FBI like Wray said... but as a "scandal" this story just died.

 

[1972 Grad]

My understanding is that Horowitz does not have the ability to subpoena or compel anyone, his ability to get statements only pertains to current government employees. Durham can subpoena and compel just about anyone he needs to. He also has the power to convene a Grand Jury and seek indictments.

Just what I thought. There could be significant differences in what they can find out then.

 

[1972 Grad]

Durham can keep it in the partisan bickering stage for a while but he really needed Horowitz to confirm some bias to keep it going. There will be some reforms made within the FBI like Wray said... but as a "scandal" this story just died.

I wouldn't write Durham off just yet.

 

[Velo Vol]

My understanding is that Horowitz does not have the ability to subpoena or compel anyone, his ability to get statements only pertains to current government employees. Durham can subpoena and compel just about anyone he needs to. He also has the power to convene a Grand Jury and seek indictments.

Horowitz investigates within the DOJ, while Durham can investigate outside it.

 

[Mick]

Am I wrong, or does Horowitz have access to government employees only, whereas Durham can go anywhere and convene grand juries, etc.? That would seem to make quite a difference in what one can conclude versus the other.

When is he going to start?