Rifleman
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Nov 28, 2012
- Messages
- 4,686
- Likes
- 6,457
My answer is that Trump supports leaders who have actually committed murders.Is that your way of not answering the question?
Also, I don't know the guy, but I would guess that the wink thing at the end is the same as using blue font.
nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.
I did miss it earlier.You may have missed my earlier question or simply chosen to ignore.
Is there a country you think has the closest-to-ideal balance between government socialism and private capitalism which would also be suitable for America to copy?
I did miss it earlier.
The US is relatively close. Once we adequately address healthcare/pharmaceuticals, do a better job of regulating a couple of industries, and return to a better environmental policy, we may be the best example.
But we can say a hybrid of Norway and Singapore.
You are the one claiming you cannot accurately compare smaller economies/populations to ours. Where does that leave us?I don't follow. You don't think it will scale and that's why you say we are moving towards best example???
Socialism can not exist, it doesn't exist in reality, it is theory, in reality it is an oligarchy quasi-feudal communist monarchy.
It is impossible that the entire community, especially on any scale larger than a working farm/sustenance community, it's impossible to ever to be able to wholly own or regulate anything of any size more than a small village void of actual business/companies or government, as it is a "social organization which advocates that the means of production, distribution, and exchange should be owned or regulated by the community as a whole".
So, take any city in America, water/waste/waste management, utilities/power/electric, maintenance, every company and business, how exactly is the "whole" going to run these with everyone's input without someone or some group deciding for the community as a whole...... any place that has over a couple hundred people will never agree on anything unless they are farmers/hunter/gatherers void of industry, infrastructure, and government. The minute there are any groups, or any entity making decisions on any matter that doesn't include the whole, it becomes something other than socialism.
Socialism is a concept.
You left the "R" off.You are the one claiming you cannot accurately compare smaller economies/populations to ours. Where does that leave us?
I don't really buy your argument, but I'll go along with it.
Regardless, the US isn't far away from being the best example once the issues I listed are addressed.
Once we take care of healthcare, re-focus on the environment, and pass some needed regulations on a couple of industries, we will be about where we need to be.
It's an evolution.
I did miss it earlier.
The US is relatively close. Once we adequately address healthcare/pharmaceuticals, do a better job of regulating a couple of industries, and return to a better environmental policy, we may be the best example.
But we can say a hybrid of Norway and Singapore.