hog88
Your ray of sunshine
- Joined
- Sep 30, 2008
- Messages
- 116,604
- Likes
- 168,611
They haven't lost many during the Saban era.
Also why do you keep avoiding my question? Can you prove your statement that "every team that invests heavily in football is cheating"?
That's 45 hours at the max. They could take a Sunday job. Many people work more than that.
yeah, because every player is enrolled in class from a set 8-2 schedule all the time with no breaks. They don't get to eat. they don't get to sleep. You kinda fail logic sometimes. This is one of those times. But you're an A's fan, so I like you.
WTF ? I hope this is just bad sarcasm and you really are not equating an 18 yr old kid getting a free ride with a head coach.
One who was probably once an 18 ye old football player and has worked his way up through years starting as a GA, moved his family all over the country working up from assistant coach in several. small schools then bigger schools...you get the picture before getting to the big money.
Football players go whatever hour they want because they get first priority to picking classes. If they have to accommodate certain hours, they can do so easily. Full time student where I'm at is 12 hours a week. That's only 3 hours a day. They probably get Friday, Saturday, and Sunday off of school. They could go to school in the morning from 9-12, practice at noon, and work until 7-8 at night easily. They could work a job with flexible hours as practice time does change.
I mean these players have time to party or do some crime.
Football players go whatever hour they want because they get first priority to picking classes. If they have to accommodate certain hours, they can do so easily. Full time student where I'm at is 12 hours a week. That's only 3 hours a day. They probably get Friday, Saturday, and Sunday off of school. They could go to school in the morning from 9-12, practice at noon, and work until 7-8 at night easily. They could work a job with flexible hours as practice time does change.
I mean these players have time to party or do some crime.
Everyone has their own path and own battles, coaches can use the free market to value their worth, same thing applies to basically every type of work relationship in the US.... well, other than a specific sub-section of college sports.
Its really isn't your business nor the schools nor the coaches how much a player makes, if the schools don't want to pay them, then they need adjust their program... either way it's not their concern.
I said it a while back, the lawsuits are only now starting, eventually unless the schools get ahead of this, it will be very bad for them.
Steve,
You are setting up a false either/or scenario. No, the players are not forced to play college football. But there are no legitimate alternatives if football is their chosen career. There are no other legitimate football leagues where one could make a living playing the sport, and the NFL prohibits entry for three years following high school. College football is little more than a developmental league that the NFL doesn't have to pay to maintain.
Saying "you can go work at Wal-Mart" is an intellectually vacant proposition, and I think you're smart enough to know that and I'm surprised you went there.
You sir seem to have a confusion problem. Football in high school or college is as you mention a sport. It is also a voluntary activity. The kids and their families market themselves, sometimes to the point of ridiculousness to coaches to get scholarship offers. They sign a LOI to play for school XY Z in exchange for consideration in the form of having their tuition, housing, meals, medical care, etc. paid for.
Nobody said anyone holding a gun to someone's head.No one is holding a gun to their head and making them play.
The player does not have an obligation to not receive money from 3rd parties, this would be completely unenforceable in most employment contracts, in general. I don't see what the NCAA has to do with anything, you don't even have to have a scholarship to play college sports. Scholarships are with schools.The contractual relationship if I am not mistaken includes language requiring the athlete to comply with the rules of the school and the governing body (NCAA).
So your argument they are owed more, deserve more and no one else has any business in whether they get packages of cash or cars, etc. is BS. If you are not willing to play by the rules you signed up for don't sign up. Go to work at WalMart. If you sign up to play college sports you have an obligation to follow the rules as long as you play. Can't do that hit the road and open up a scholly for a kid who wants it.
I don't believe I ever said any such thing, matter of fact, if the schools goals are to make it what it was... .a school activity, I don't see why they can't do that.You are probably right about one thing. Lawyers and/or the government will eventually ruin football.
Greed and entitlement philosophy will probably tear it down just as fast.
Steve,
You are setting up a false either/or scenario. No, the players are not forced to play college football. But there are no legitimate alternatives if football is their chosen career. There are no other legitimate football leagues where one could make a living playing the sport, and the NFL prohibits entry for three years following high school. College football is little more than a developmental league that the NFL doesn't have to pay to maintain.
Saying "you can go work at Wal-Mart" is an intellectually vacant proposition, and I think you're smart enough to know that and I'm surprised you went there.
So?
Nobody said anyone holding a gun to someone's head.
The player does not have an obligation to not receive money from 3rd parties, this would be completely unenforceable in most employment contracts, in general. I don't see what the NCAA has to do with anything, you don't even have to have a scholarship to play college sports. Scholarships are with schools.
Sorry, but what you are talking about is going away for obvious reason. Under your logic, someone can be employed by Walmart can be paid 1 meatball a year. Your understanding of the statute laws of the Federal and State is low that is hard to even have a conversation on the subject.
Under your theory, your employer can pay you one meatball a year for your wages, and they can get with all the other employers and come up with a contract to ban you from the employed.