butchna
Sit down and tell me all about it...way over there
- Joined
- Jan 6, 2013
- Messages
- 105,648
- Likes
- 219,453
The statement above is made generally with regard to advocates and not to the Tucker situation or her previous situation. Didn’t say she specifically is lying or isn’t credible.I don’t disagree but this woman did have a horrific gang rape happen involving Oregon St players 20 years ago. The players actually admitted to taking advantage while she was unconscious. So her original claim that led to her career as working with programs to educate on sexual assault is more than credible.
Does that mean she’s being honest here? That’s another matter but it does lead credence to her credibility
The statement above is made generally with regard to advocates and not to the Tucker situation or her previous situation. Didn’t say she specifically is lying or isn’t credible.
Let’s think about how we’ve had false allegations with guys like AJ Johnson and how he was unjustly stripped of playing time and lots of pro money. He received no sue process until exonerated years later in court.
Read again-it’s a general statement. Furthermore, AJ Johnson faced similar allegations and was completely innocent but was denied due process and lost playing time and earnings because of advocates and over-zealous people who didn’t presume innocence. As I’ve stated, I don’t know the facts and didn’t presume judgment on anyone but merely stated it’s been proven that “advocates” and over zealous individuals have demolished due process and the presumption of innocence. And it’s objectively true that innocent men have been substantially harmed in the process. Let’s let the police and courts do their thing.He already admitted to masturbating over the phone to her, so that part isn’t alleged. He’s just claiming it was consensual. Either way, that’s pretty terrible judgement, especially considering she is a sexual assault survivor / advocate.
He called her and did all she’s accusing him of, after she had already made her 3 appearances in front of the team. What would he have left to hold over her/take from her?Well she was a third party contractor. He was her boss for all intense and purposes. She has the contract bc he gave it to her. He could just as easily take it away.
She's going to sue the school and win anyway. After this was reported to them, the school waited to suspend him which is probably against their own sexual harassment policy.Tough call. Would, giving him a penny, hurt them in the inevitable lawsuit this person brings against the Univeristy? Dont know. Optics wouldn't be good.
It would appear as though those three meetings weren't all that was agreed toHe called her and did all she’s accusing him of, after she had already made her 3 appearances in front of the team. What would he have left to hold over her/take from her?
What did I say that was incorrect? Why don’t you stop having a meltdown and read the source? Comparing it to AJ Johnson is totally irrelevant, as Tucker isn’t facing criminal charges, and I only pointed out what he already admitted to.Read again-it’s a general statement. Furthermore, AJ Johnson faced similar allegations and was completely innocent but was denied due process and lost playing time and earnings because of advocates and over-zealous people who didn’t presume innocence. As I’ve stated, I don’t know the facts and didn’t presume judgment on anyone but merely stated it’s been proven that “advocates” and over zealous individuals have demolished due process and the presumption of innocence. And it’s objectively true that innocent men have been substantially harmed in the process. Let’s let the police and courts do their thing.
I have to say these accusations and everything surrounding them are the most stupid things I have heard in a long time. Tuggernuts is an abject idiot for doing this in the first place. The woman is either lying or a bigger idiot. All she had to do was hang up the phone if there was a problem. Perhaps don't answer the phone in the first place. For goodness sakes don't keep up this phone relationship for so long if it is truly troubling. Oh, the timing seems mighty convenient as well, doesn't it? This stinks to high heaven. If I was paying someone $80 million for a 5-7 record I might be tempted to dig for a little dirt.The statement above is made generally with regard to advocates and not to the Tucker situation or her previous situation. Didn’t say she specifically is lying or isn’t credible.
Let’s think about how we’ve had false allegations with guys like AJ Johnson and how he was unjustly stripped of playing time and lots of pro money. He received no sue process until exonerated years later in court.
And do you have a reputable source for this statement? And one that takes into account that many claimants owe their jobs (and their source of income) to the accused?A big part of the me too movement is people who regret being promiscuous and escalate something to the r word when no coercion was involved. These accusations usually come years later with no evidence other than changed hearsay and have no accompanying police report. Not saying that happened here at all, but the false accusations that happened have made me skeptical of accusations and “advocates”.
Yeah see Knox News Sentinel coverage of AJ Johnson. On a national level look up the “Mattress Girl” saga. Justice Brett Kavanaugh is another. Director Daria Argento filed allegations and it was later shown she had relations with an underage actor on her set. Shortly after that her fiancé Anthony Bourdain hung himself. Countless others but does that work for a start?And do you have a reputable source for this statement? And one that takes into account that many claimants owe their jobs (and their source of income) to the accused?
Yeah-I don’t know what level of evidence is necessary since Mich St is a govt institution and presumably has a higher firing threshold than a private at will employer but it’s a bad look if it’s true he admitted to calling her and doing what was alleged. That certainly is an ethical violation.Even if it was all consensual, they still probably have an out to fire him from the moral turpitude clause in his contract. This is mostly about getting out from that stupid contract. If he was still winning at the level he was a couple years ago, they're instead moving heaven and earth to figure out a way to keep him.