tim
Volsquatch
- Joined
- Jan 19, 2007
- Messages
- 18,880
- Likes
- 5,514
You didn't want it bad enough. What was your problem? People wait an hour to go to restaurants. You couldn't wait 2 hrs to vote? And you went 3 different times? You left a huge carbon footprint ripping and running to the poll and still didn't vote after the 3rd time.lol....
I went to vote early three different times but left because the wait was more than 2 hours. There was a precinct in another part of the county that consistently had no wait.
My goodness, you're even socialist when it comes to waiting in line to vote.I thought you said it should not be easier in one precinct than in another.
If 2 hours isn't a big enough difference, what time frame would be?
I think 2 hours is a huge difference btw, but I would gladly wait 2 hours if that was the norm everywhere.
Dont be a jackass. The fake ballots weren't in a UFO, they were in a skittles server that commandos stole from Germany and transported by Ferrari to Detroit. Duh.Yeah, pre-marked ballots and rigged voting machines will be flown in again from Venezuela, on Democratic aircraft just like 2020. Here's the proof!
No carbon footprint, the polling site was across the street from my place of employment, which is also less than a couple of miles from my house. I've always made the choice to live where I work, or work where I live.You didn't want it bad enough. What was you problem? People wait an hour to go to restaurants. You couldn't wait 2 hrs to vote? And you went 3 different times? You left a huge carbon footprint ripping and running to the poll and still didn't vote after the 3rd time.
WTF are you doing? Are you voting in minority precincts? Are you there to gentrify the neighborhood?Sure, I have too. You know that's not the point.
The average wait time on election day is vastly different from one precinct to the next and the precincts with the longest wait times are almost always in minority areas.
You have already answered yes to the question........Do you think that the easier it is to cast a vote the more likely it is that people will vote who shouldn't?
I'm confident you understand the point.
Violence has its place and time.True, but you don’t deal with unjust laws or unfair outcomes by storming buildings and rioting. Civil disobedience is fine, violence and destruction are not.
Then I bet your problem was that you went to the polling place at lunch time... the same time everybody else with a job was over there.All but about 10 weeks.
There were several posters who agreed with the concept that that there should not be vast differences in the ease of voting from one precinct to the next.I'm commenting on your last sentence. That is enough.
Still not the point. The point was the discrepancies in ease of voting between precincts.Then I bet your problem was that you went to the polling place at lunch time... the same time everybody else with a job was over there.
Hell, if the polling place was as close as you say it was to your office, you really had access to the polling place for more than 3 attempts.
Many feel the same way about ID’s for voting, anyone who doesn’t agree with it is just plain dumb.There were several posters who agreed with the concept that that there should not be vast differences in the ease of voting from one precinct to the next.
Actually, anyone who doesn't agree with that concept is just plain dumb. But sometimes we have to take baby steps.