Different camera angle on Pig Fumble. MUST SEE!

[InVOLuntary]

I were watching the game in Hi Def on CBS. I'm guessing that you've seen nothing other than the GIFs posted on this message board.

I've watched in 1080p on my 60" 120hz led TV. I have advanced it frame by frame, watched in slow motion and at full speed. I am confident there was not enough video evidence to overturn the call on the field.

 

[InVOLuntary]

You care quite a lot.

Yes I care when filth clutters up a Vol forum.

 

[Bryan1]

Then we were watching the same thing. But I saw what the rest of the world saw, while you've desperately tried to convince yourself of something that didn't happen because it makes you feel better about the result. I understand.

Then you show me the proof, video evidence of exactly when that ball came out! I guess you didn't see exactly what the line judge on the field saw. Better yet, I couldn't care less what a bammers opinion is.

 

[bamawriter]

I've watched in 1080p on my 60" 120hz led TV. I have advanced it frame by frame, watched in slow motion and at full speed. I am confident there was not enough video evidence to overturn the call on the field.

Well, everyone who counts, and the vast, vast majority of those that don't count, disagree with you.

 

[bamawriter]

Yes I care when filth clutters up a Vol forum.

So you lied before? Looks like all of your posts should be viewed with scepticism.

 

[InVOLuntary]

Well, everyone who counts, and the vast, vast majority of those that don't count, disagree with you.

There you go. Stick that nose in there good. It suits you.

 

[Bryan1]

Well, everyone who counts, and the vast, vast majority of those that don't count, disagree with you.

The vast majority of the ones that don't count probably don't even know what the true rules are either.

 

[InVOLuntary]

So you lied before? Looks like all of your posts should be viewed with scepticism.

Since when did I lie?

 

[InVOLuntary]

The vast majority of the ones that don't count probably don't even know what the true rules are either.

You're wasting your time with this mouth breather.

 

[NMVol]

Guy hasn't even looked at the alternative angle yet keeps the blow hard going. Amazing.

 

[bamawriter]

Then you show me the proof, video evidence of exactly when that ball came out! I guess you didn't see exactly what the line judge on the field saw.

Hypothetically, who is more likely to get a call correct:

The official on the field who is having to watch action happening very quickly, in real time, with only one vantage point?

OR

The replay official, who has the benefit of multiple cameras and slo-mo?

 

[bamawriter]

How does it feel to hang out with folks that really could care less if you're around?

Yes I care when filth clutters up a Vol forum.

Or were you speaking for other posters besides yourself?

 

[Bryan1]

Hypothetically, who is more likely to get a call correct:

The official on the field who is having to watch action happening very quickly, in real time, with only one vantage point?

OR

The replay official, who has the benefit of multiple cameras and slo-mo?

Well, the ref that made the call was like what?.....3 friggin feet away from the play!

 

[bamawriter]

Guy hasn't even looked at the alternative angle yet keeps the blow hard going. Amazing.

Which alternative angle would that be?

 

[InVOLuntary]

Or were you speaking for other posters besides yourself?

Want to start a poll? Be my guest.

 

[NMVol]

Which alternative angle would that be?

Uh, the one in the opening post.

 

[Bryan1]

Uh, the one in the opening post.

LOL, I think he is just trolling now !

 

[bamawriter]

Well, the ref that made the call was like what?.....3 friggin feet away from the play!

So, your answer is the official on the field.

So, you see no point in even having instant replay review? I mean, if the official on the field has the best vantage point, and slow motion is of no benefit, I can't see a single reason to slow down the game.

 

[bamawriter]

Uh, the one in the opening post.

Why would you assume I hadn't seen that angle? I saw it when it was first posted.

 

[Bryan1]

So, your answer is the official on the field.

So, you see no point in even having instant replay review? I mean, if the official on the field has the best vantage point, and slow motion is of no benefit, I can't see a single reason to slow down the game.

Apparently not, if they can't even get a call that simple right. I have saw no proof yet that the call on the field should have been over turned!

 

[govols/cc]

Hell no! And for the record Caldwell never had possession for Florida .

It's because it was Jabar Gaffney.

 

[Bryan1]

It's because it was Jabar Gaffney.

and it was for Florida.

 

[bamawriter]

Apparently not, if they can't even get a call that simple right. I have saw no proof yet that the call on the field should have been over turned!

That's because you don't want to see it.

 

[NMVol]

Why would you assume I hadn't seen that angle? I saw it when it was first posted.

bamawriter:

I were watching the game in Hi Def on CBS. I'm guessing that you've seen nothing other than the GIFs posted on this message board.

Spoken like a true bama fan! Complete joke, trolls a thread for hundreds of posts and hasn't even watched the different angle that is posted on Facebook. Talk about loss of credibility.

 

[Sudden Impact]

This thread is a circle jerk thread and yes we have gotten a lot of attention. What amazes me is that we are getting it from bama writer who must not have anything better to do.

Hopefully this thread will be merged into the Official GameDay Thread and it will remain their for our kids and grand kids to view....

To move forward you have to let go. Fumble. period. The way that it was called out of the replay booth. What has been gained by still talking about it. Does not change anything. Debatable when it happened but it is in the history books now. Nothing is going to change the latter.