Your "eye test" would be the subjective part. Comparing this years rules to last years is absurd. Rules are different, number of teams are different....
Do you think we would pass the "eye test"? If they used that as a major criteria, we would be out. We are 1-1 against teams ranked in the final poll. We didn't hammer any SEC team and didn't score in the first half for 3 straight games.
What decisions from previous weeks did they not stick to? Examples?
You say they have no morals, that is a pretty bold statement without having met any of them.
Which committee rules are different this year? Please show me. Why is comparing playoffs from this year to last year absurd, in your mind? Is this not the same sport and the same participating organizations? I cannot see any difference besides format.
How can you convince anyone TN would be out by comparing our results to teams ranked in the final poll? TN is one of 4 playoff teams who have bested another team ranked inside of the top 12. The Vols have a top 5 defense in both points allowed and yards allowed. What is an “eye test” in your mind? I need some explanation for that loose theory.
Clemson lost to South Carolina and Georgia before beating SMU at neutral site. Alabama beat both South Carolina and Georgia. The best comparison that anyone has to use between SMU and Alabama is 100% in favor of Alabama.
-Why was SMU dropped, yet just enough to stay ahead of Alabama?
-Why was Alabama ahead of Tennessee when they had lost to TN and they were each 2 loss teams?
- Why is Ohio State behind Penn State when Ohio State beat Penn State and they each have 2 losses?
- Why was Ohio State left ahead of Tennessee when Tennessee now has the higher Strength of Record and Strength of Schedule?
- Why is Texas ahead of Ohio State and Tennessee when they have zero wins against ranked teams? All three have two losses.
- How did Notre Dame prove that they belong among the top 12 when their best victory was against the 22nd ranked team?
None of this follows logic.
Bold? OK, sure.. The committee doesn’t have to be careful with their reasons, but I have to be careful with my condemnation of them.. I have no reason for holding reserve when speaking about a committee led by an AD who attempted to retain the head coach who was the center of the biggest College Football cheating scandal to date in this century. You defending this charade is the only stretch of imagination from where I sit.