Dobbs has gotten FREAKIN HUGE

#76
#76
PrattvilleVol said:
Um No. Worley is awful and CP padded his HS numbers. Any HS QB throwing the ball within 10 yds of CP would be a legend in HS.
Click to expand...

Worley beat USCjr...What was Dobbs big signature win?...Kentucky?....He didn't have his first touchdown pass until that game and it should've been intercepted and low and behold the UK guy living up to his schools reputation in football tipped it to our guy for the score...Worley is EASILY the better QB...There is no argument you can make to prove it otherwise.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#77
#77
VOLnMiami said:
Worley beat USCjr...What was Dobbs big signature win?...Kentucky?....He didn't have his first touchdown pass until that game and it should've been intercepted and low and behold the UK guy living up to his schools reputation in football tipped it to our guy for the score...Worley is EASILY the better QB...There is no argument you can make to prove it otherwise.
Click to expand...

We don't beat USCe without two amazing catches from North. I say amazing because they were poorly under thrown and he had to stop and adjust to the ball to make the catch. That seemed to be the problem with Worley, he was always under throwing or trying to skip the ball to the off the ground to the WR.

Now he did seem to improve down the stretch but to say he is easily the better QB is stretching things a tad.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#78
#78
chatt-townVOL said:
Yup...... still confused.

Can we all just agree that Worley is the current front runner (as anyone with any logic would assume) and Dobbs is awful and move on?
Click to expand...

No, we can't all agree on that. The only awful QB I saw last year was Peterman.

I still think Dobbs has great potential based on what I saw vs Bama and Missouri. It's very logical to believe that a year in the film and weight rooms sees him improve tremendously. I remember a lot of people wanting Branndon Stewart over Peyton cause he didn't look very good, at all, at times as a freshman. But Peyton took a quantum leap forward and was a Heisman trophy candidate for much of his sophomore year. Not saying Dobbs is Peyton, just that I expect to see great improvement from his true freshman year.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#79
#79
KBVol said:
No, we can't all agree on that. The only awful QB I saw last year was Peterman.

I still think Dobbs has great potential based on what I saw vs Bama and Missouri. It's very logical to believe that a year in the film and weight rooms sees him improve tremendously. I remember a lot of people wanting Branndon Stewart over Peyton cause he didn't look very good, at all, at times as a freshman. But Peyton took a quantum leap forward and was a Heisman trophy candidate for much of his sophomore year. Not saying Dobbs is Peyton, just that I expect to see great improvement from his true freshman year.
Click to expand...

I was one of those. Stewart reminded me of Shuler while Peyton looked like Kelly.
 
#81
#81
VolDango said:
I think OP is over reacting a tad. 210 doesn't really count as "freaking huge" when you're 6'2 or 6'3. If true, it is a nice weight gain for Dobbs. But it's not like he's going to look like a linebacker.
Click to expand...

I am 6'2 and 205 and I dont consider myself huge, being 41 PROBABLY DOESNT HELP EITHER! Now my son who is going to be Sophmore next year in HS is 6'3 and weighing in at 290 he could be considered on the large side. He is the proverbial Road grader on the field!:rock:
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#82
#82
VOLnMiami said:
Worley beat USCjr...What was Dobbs big signature win?...Kentucky?....He didn't have his first touchdown pass until that game and it should've been intercepted and low and behold the UK guy living up to his schools reputation in football tipped it to our guy for the score...Worley is EASILY the better QB...There is no argument you can make to prove it otherwise.
Click to expand...

Certainly there's an argument to "prove" it otherwise if you can "prove" Whirlwind Worley is the default starter. Just ask the Rifleman Riley supporters.

Meanwhile the Dobb Goblin says to those who erroneously question his arm strength: HA HA HA HA HA HAHAHA GOBLIN'S GONNA GITCHA.
 
Last edited:
#83
#83
volfan_89 said:
We don't beat USCe without two amazing catches from North. I say amazing because they were poorly under thrown and he had to stop and adjust to the ball to make the catch. That seemed to be the problem with Worley, he was always under throwing or trying to skip the ball to the off the ground to the WR.

Now he did seem to improve down the stretch but to say he is easily the better QB is stretching things a tad.
Click to expand...

Yes he is....EASILY the better QB...Makes me laugh anyone even argues about it. :eek:lol:
 
#85
#85
He plays QB right? What does it matter if he's ripped and puts on 20 lbs of muscle? He wasnt the fastest guy to begin with and now he's gonna be slower. Adding all that muscle wont help him make better decisions with the football.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#86
#86
PrattvilleVol said:
Sorry you're confused. I'm talking about 60 yds. worth of completed passes (not to mention several drops) and his ability to run with some added long runs, that set Neal up for the score. It is a team game you know.
Click to expand...



LMAO ... Yet you said Dobbs scored single hand-idly
 
#87
#87
Some Dobbs followers are getting all butt hurt now...Don't worry folks, He'll make a great clip board holder for CBJ....Not sure what he has shown to you that he deserves anything close to the starting job....Worley was getting better and Dobbs only got worse as the season progressed...But hey keep on carrying that flag for him, It gives those of us who live in reality something to laugh at.
 
#90
#90
VOLnMiami said:
Yes he is....EASILY the better QB...Makes me laugh anyone even argues about it. :eek:lol:
Click to expand...

Make your argument that Worley is easily the better QB. Outside of USCe and UGA in which games the WRs bailed out Worley which made him look better, Worley looked mediocre at best.

I'm not arguing that Dobbs is better just that Worley isn't easily the best as you stated. CBJ said it was an open competition for a reason. If Worley was easily the best he would already be named out starter.
 
Last edited:
#91
#91
volfan_89 said:
Make your argument that Worley is easily the better QB. Outside of USCe and UGA in which games the WRs bailed out Worley which made him look better, Worley looked mediocre at best.

I'm not arguing that Dobbs is better just that Worley isn't easily the best as you stated. CBJ said it was an open competition for a reason. If Worley was easily the best he would already be our named our starter.
Click to expand...

So every time a WR makes a good catch he's just bailing the qb out? Last I checked the still has to get there and not throw an int.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#92
#92
K-town Vol Fan said:
So every time a WR makes a good catch he's just bailing the qb out? Last I checked the still has to get there and not throw an int.
Click to expand...

To a certain extent yes, though not every time. The catches North had against USCe, without which we don't win that game, he had to stop and adjust to the ball because it was under-thrown. So yes in that instance the WR bailed out the QB. On one of those catches if the ball had been thrown better North catches it in stride he would likely have a TD.
 
#93
#93
volfan_89 said:
To a certain extent yes, though not every time. The catches North had against USCe, without which we don't win that game, he had to stop and adjust to the ball because it was under-thrown. So yes in that instance the WR bailed out the QB. On one of those catches if the ball had been thrown better North catches it in stride he would likely have a TD.
Click to expand...

Okay. What about the one to Howard? You could also argue that with Dobbs in there we wouldn't have even been in a position to win the game seeing as how Dobbs threw at least one INT every game.
 
#94
#94
K-town Vol Fan said:
Okay. What about the one to Howard? You could also argue that with Dobbs in there we wouldn't have even been in a position to win the game seeing as how Dobbs threw at least one INT every game.
Click to expand...

True but there was several times when Dobbs was in that the ball hit WR in the hands and they couldn't make the catch. Happened in the bama and vandy games. In the bama game it wouldn't have made a difference but had WR made the catch in the vandy game who knows how that game turns out.
 
#95
#95
volfan_89 said:
True but there was several times when Dobbs was in that the ball hit WR in the hands and they couldn't make the catch. Happened in the bama and vandy games. In the bama game it wouldn't have made a difference but had WR made the catch in the vandy game who knows how that game turns out.
Click to expand...

If our wr's catch Worley's passes better than Dobbs....doesn't that make Worley the better option?
 
#96
#96
volfan_89 said:
True but there was several times when Dobbs was in that the ball hit WR in the hands and they couldn't make the catch. Happened in the bama and vandy games. In the bama game it wouldn't have made a difference but had WR made the catch in the vandy game who knows how that game turns out.
Click to expand...

Drops happen every game. Its only the catches that matter. I don't think that drop would have changed the outcome of the Bama game and I do believe the general consensus on VN is we most likely beat Vandy if Worley starts.

Dobbs is a good kid but I don't understand why some people are in love with him. I know he was a freshman but he didnt really show that he is the guy next year. He made some really bad decisions with the football and that is what kills chances of winning. Worley on the other hand may not have the greatest arm and accuracy, but he HAS proven he can lead this team to a big win WITHOUT turning the ball over. Dobbs just isn't that good of a QB. There's a reason only one other SEC school offered him.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#97
#97
Lol people forget how bad Worley was as well.. He wasn't gonna beat any of the teams Dobbs didn't.. Maybe Vandy
 
#98
#98
AV_12 said:
Lol people forget how bad Worley was as well.. He wasn't gonna beat any of the teams Dobbs didn't.. Maybe Vandy
Click to expand...

...and people forget he beat USC. Say what you want about Norths catch but Worley still had to manage the game and not turn the ball over.
 
#99
#99
K-town Vol Fan said:
Drops happen every game. Its only the catches that matter. I don't think that drop would have changed the outcome of the Bama game and I do believe the general consensus on VN is we most likely beat Vandy if Worley starts.

Dobbs is a good kid but I don't understand why some people are in love with him. I know he was a freshman but he didnt really show that he is the guy next year. He made some really bad decisions with the football and that is what kills chances of winning. Worley on the other hand may not have the greatest arm and accuracy, but he HAS proven he can lead this team to a big win WITHOUT turning the ball over. Dobbs just isn't that good of a QB. There's a reason only one other SEC school offered him.
Click to expand...

Do you not remember the game threads when JUSTIN WORLEY was playing? North saved his ass vs South Carolina.. He got benched for Peterman.. Come on.. This is my last comment on the QBs till spring because some people will never understand
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#100
#100
K-town Vol Fan said:
...and people forget he beat USC. Say what you want about Norths catch but Worley still had to manage the game and not turn the ball over.
Click to expand...
Lol North made a few 3rd and long plays that helped.. Please. It's not like we lit it up on offense.. Hell we has to punt it with good field position a few times late because Worley couldn't move the ball.. Defense rose up that game
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top