bleedingTNorange
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 9, 2012
- Messages
- 74,100
- Likes
- 50,334
Honestly, I thought the program would be decimated. I expected recruiting to fall off and expected to miss the dance for multiple years. That was right after Cal left. When Pastner was hired, the smart fans knew we were hiring a proven recruiter and an unproven coach.
Memphis media and fans got caught up after Pastner landed that first big class and Pastner sort of became a victim of his own success. I posed this hypo to a Tigers messageboard:
Imagine Pastner never lands Barton, Kendrick or Joe Jackson (someone Memphis wasn't recruiting under Cal). He lands the mid-range Memphis guys like Tarik Black and Chris Crawford, and fills in the gaps with no-name 3 stars. And then he goes out and gets us the exact results that he has over these last 3 seasons. Memphis fans would be satisfied, even excited. We're winning C-USA and back to the dance after only missing a year.
So it's not so much the result, but the means in which he got there. If we'd be happy with the results if he coached his way there, why is it different if he recruits his way there? There's tons of great coaches out there that can't recruit at all, but it's arugably half the game at this point.
those are valid points and i can see that side. i tend to look at it that he still had a decent team left his first year, his second year was stacked(if cal can do it with frosh why cant josh), this year was supposesd to be a great year for them from everything i heard pre-season. is a 1st round exit acceptable in tiger land?
im not there so i dont get the pulse, but from what i read and hear it seems a 1st round loss would start rumblings. it seems if he loses a couple c-usa games, doesnt win c-usa, and misses the ncaa tournament that things will really heat up. is this accurate or do you think he has a couple more years no matter what?