Tell you what Ronald. Let’s just kill all these subsidies that go for these idiotic green energies and Elon’s idiotic franken charger. How’s that?Maybe he's following the lead of these guys's --
Texas’s Oil and Gas Industry Is Defending Its Billions in Subsidies Against a Green Energy Push
The state's energy business has long counted on special tax breaks and other largesse not available to others. Whether renewables or fossil fuels get more depends on how you do the math.
Texas's Oil and Gas Industry Is Defending Its Billions in Subsidies Against a Green Energy Push
The state's energy business has long counted on tax breaks and other largesse. Whether renewables or fossil fuels get more depends on how you do the math.www.texasmonthly.com
Carbon capture, hydrogen, renewables, and greener petroleum-based plastics constitute “four pillars of what could be the new economy of Houston over the next fifteen years,” said Perlman, the head of the Houston business group, whose conservative credentials also include a stint as an appointee to the state’s Public Utilities Commission by then-governor George W. Bush. But making that pivot won’t come cheap. As his group maps paths to decarbonize a region that’s a global hub for fossil fuels, it’s doing what Texas energy players have done since the discovery of oil at Spindletop. It’s angling for more subsidies.
Does this "$399" not apply to your condition(s) ?
"Lease starting at $399/mo*"
Loading…
www.tesla.com
Last week, Tesla quoted a monthly payment of $419/month for the Model 3 and $499/month for the Model Y on each base model. But today we’re seeing payments of $329/month and $399/month respectively, with the same down payment ($4,500), term (36 months), and mileage (10k/yr) as the previous prices were quoted.
Oct 12 2023
Tesla slashes lease pricing on Model 3/Y, expects to lose half tax credit on 3
Hot on the heels of a price drop that makes the Model 3 the cheapest Tesla yet, Tesla has also...electrek.co
Yep and if they were viable they wouldn’t need help. This kill them all. Thanks for proving my point
No need. I was simply giving you other examples, Cavet.
@UT-Rex hey Ronald if Elon’s toy truck is so viable why is he asking the government for $100M for just nine charging stations? HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
In simple terms you are not smart enough to understand why thermodynamics won’t allow that statement to be true Ronald.
In simple terms you are not smart enough to understand why thermodynamics won’t allow that statement to be true Ronald.
In taking battery power and making mechanical torque there are losses the first of which comes to mind is the I^2R motor winding losses. The same losses come into play in converting mechanical energy into electric power via regenerative braking its the same I^2R loss going that way. You also have fundamental conversion process inefficiencies. It isn’t possible Ronald but since some Tesla lackey said it now it’s gospel for you
Yep and if they were viable they wouldn’t need help. This kill them all. Thanks for proving my point
www.teslarati.com
Let’s hope Abbott tells Elon to piss off on his franken charger!"Tesla is reportedly seeking around $100 million in funding for a charging route from Texas to California that would host nine charging stations for all electric-semi trucks, according to a new report from Bloomberg.
Tesla is seeking federal funding because it told Texas government officials that it could qualify for grants that would be a part of the bipartisan infrastructure program that was launched by the Biden White House to help build more EV charging stations for both passenger and commercial vehicles.
Tesla requested the help of state officials in the form of a written letter that would support the “charging corridor” that the automaker applied and submitted its application for in June."
Tesla seeks $100M in funding for Semi charging route from TX to CA: Bloomberg
Tesla is reportedly seeking around $100 million in funding for a charging route from Texas to California that would host nine charging stations for all electric-semi trucks, according to a new report from Bloomberg. Emails seen by the publication state that Tesla wants each of the stations to...
In simple terms the original claim that I called bull **** is still bull ****. The claim was “near net zero” that you were fapping over Ronald. Now you’re moving the goal posts to “it increases range”
Go read post 3122 Ronald. I highlighted in red where the BS was. The hilarious part is you’ve dropped that same quote at least twice more since
