You can't answer the question.
1. Should silver medals be handed out.
2. Should the runner-up get a trophy too
Wow. Are you really this dense?
1. Yes. Y...E...S
2. Yes. Y...E...S
There, I even spelled it out for you. Got it?
So at what point should we stop handing out rings and the like? I mean, if a team goes 1-32 they won a game so they should be rewarded for something, right?
Answer my questions first broom-boy. How many people should get trophies?
There is no debate, dude.
The players wanted rings for making the elite 8, why do you care?
Again, you're missing the point. This whole thing hasn't been if we should be "allowed" to buy rings. It's undisputed that anyone could buy a ring for anything. It's the fact that rings in sports are synonymous with championships that is at issue. Buying rings for yourselves after not winning a championship of any sort makes you look like you're pretending to be something you're not. Why that is hard for some of you to get, I'm not sure.
I've stated my point about 15 times in this thread. If you haven't figured it out yet, stop and consider what that says about you.
Maturity at it's finest.
If Dooley wanted to have rings made that said 2 wins on it then they could have rings too.
There's a difference in a silver medal and a gold metal. 1 is silver and 1 is gold.
There is a difference between and elite 8 ring and a national championship ring. 1. Has more bling and says national champions and 1 has elite 8.
So once again why are you acting as they are celebrating a championship?
Because I equate rings with titles, not with having a good season. I don't know why that's so hard to understand. I don't care if it's UT, Baylor, or whoever, elite eight rings are silly.
Again, you're missing the point. This whole thing hasn't been if we should be "allowed" to buy rings. It's undisputed that anyone could buy a ring for anything. It's the fact that rings in sports are synonymous with championships that is at issue. Buying rings for yourselves after not winning a championship of any sort makes you look like you're pretending to be something you're not. Why that is hard for some of you to get, I'm not sure.
Your point is incorrect as the rings were bought for winning enough games to make it to the Elite 8, not for losing the final game. All but 1 team in the NCAA tourney ends its season with a loss....Just make sure you understand the rings were bought as a celebration for winning important games last season. If you think UT said "Hey we lost that game to Michigan State.....RINGS FOR EVERYONE!!" you are certainly ignorant or are being unnecessarily and ineffectively over-sarcastic. To use one of your gems, it's dumb that you think the team got rings for losing.
I want to give you a challenge....try to not insult my intelligence in your rebuttal.