I talked with a lawyer I know and we actually ran through this topic. The idea is if you are "in control of the vehicle" you open the door to a DUI if also sufficiently intoxicated. This can almost be read as "If intoxicated proximate to a vehicle of which you have the keys you are open to a DUI charge.". He didn't really disagree when I posited that such a POV by the law literally diminishes the reason to not just say "F'it, might as well drive drunk since in the eyes of the law I'm just as guilty trying to sleep it off.".
That's nonsensical is hell to me.
That's nonsensical is hell to me.