End of Driver’s Licensing

#151
#151
DC_Vol said:
The law doesn’t need to be so black and white. If the car is not moving, hasn’t been in an accident, and the drunk dude isn’t operating it (but sleeping in it), there’s absolutely no reason to arrest him for DUI.

Why intentionally punish someone for making the decision NOT to drive?
Click to expand...
This will go straight over his head. All he knows is "the law"... and these cops/oathbreakers enforce these laws without discretion or proper discernment.
 
#153
#153
Rasputin_Vol said:
This will go straight over his head. All he knows is "the law"... and these cops/oathbreakers enforce these laws without discretion or proper discernment.
Click to expand...
Guessing you missed the post directly above yours but you are the definition of paranoid
 
#154
#154
ClearwaterVol said:
I agree, but there will come a point. Probably not for 25 or so years, but there will come a point...
Click to expand...
If we have driverless vehicles that will likely drive the speed limit as well, then WTF would we do with all of these ticket writing, oathbreaking cops?
 
#155
#155
Rickyvol77 said:
No don’t be drunk or high in public passed out. Especially in a car. Like everyday normal people
Click to expand...

No, you don't get to change the discussion. You made a clear distinction that sleeping in the pickup bed of a truck = sleeping in the backseat with no keys on your person = not a DUI. I'm just pointing out that you are making distinctions without a difference, and asking you where you expect someone's keys to be in this scenario you've put forth if not on their person.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rasputin_Vol
#156
#156
MercyPercy said:
No, you don't get to change the discussion. You made a clear distinction that sleeping in the pickup bed of a truck = sleeping in the backseat with no keys on your person = not a DUI. I'm just pointing out that you are making distinctions without a difference, and asking you where you expect someone's keys to be in this scenario you've put forth if not on their person.
Click to expand...
If their keys are on their person or in their immediate vicinity it can be a DUI. If not then they aren’t in control of vehicle. It’s not rocket science.
 
#157
#157
GordonC said:
If that quote is true, I wonder what would happen if someone was outside the vehicle and had called a cab/uber and the cab/uber was late arriving and an officer got there first.
I'd like to think the officer would at least wait for the cab/uber to arrive.
Click to expand...

No need to even be next to your car. Just be sitting outside of the bar after it closes while you wait for your Uber. These oathbreakers will put them bracelets on you for any reason.

 
#158
#158
Rickyvol77 said:
If their keys are on their person or in their immediate vicinity it can be a DUI. If not then they aren’t in control of vehicle. It’s not rocket science.
Click to expand...

Where do you want them to put the keys?

What about push to start? Yall taking yardsticks out there to see if the key fob is close enough to vehicle to get push to start to work?

Damn, it's almost like it's not a black and white scenario like you are claiming.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rasputin_Vol
#159
#159
Rasputin_Vol said:
No need to even be next to your car. Just be sitting outside of the bar after it closes while you wait for your Uber. These oathbreakers will put them bracelets on you for any reason.

Click to expand...

I wouldn’t have done that and neither would several hundred thousand police officers. But sure these two definitely show that all would be those “oath breakers” lol. You still think the army and police are going to round up your guns and vaxx you too 😂
 
#160
#160
Rickyvol77 said:
If their keys are on their person or in their immediate vicinity it can be a DUI. If not then they aren’t in control of vehicle. It’s not rocket science.
Click to expand...
Does that make sense to you? That is as silly as having to wear a mask as you walk to your table and then can take it off once you sit down. What difference does it make if his keys are in his pocket or in the trunk thrown in the woods? If the vehicle isn't moving and they aren't driving, what is the issue?

Again, you cops lack discernment and common sense.
 
#161
#161
MercyPercy said:
Where do you want them to put the keys?

What about push to start? Yall taking yardsticks out there to see if the key fob is close enough to vehicle to get push to start to work?

Damn, it's almost like it's not a black and white scenario like you are claiming.
Click to expand...
Who said it was black or white? I said every scenario was different. I’m as explaining to the posters who lacked understanding about TN’s DUI TCA code and “how does this make any sense” but some think no one should ever be arrested, some think everyone should be arrested and one thinks being passed out drunk or high in public is no big deal if he was arrested for one crime but not the other
 
#162
#162
Rickyvol77 said:
I wouldn’t have done that and neither would several hundred thousand police officers. But sure these two definitely show that all would be those “oath breakers” lol. You still think the army and police are going to round up your guns and vaxx you too 😂
Click to expand...
A laughing emoji. Interesting...
 
#163
#163
Rasputin_Vol said:
Does that make sense to you? That is as silly as having to wear a mask as you walk to your table and then can take it off once you sit down. What difference does it make if his keys are in his pocket or in the trunk thrown in the woods? If the vehicle isn't moving and they aren't driving, what is the issue?

Again, you cops lack discernment and common sense.
Click to expand...
“You cops” lol I have arrested people for DUI. I have let drunk people get a ride home before too. Context matters as much as what is actually going on. I’ve explained the reason this law was rewritten to cover this especially with number of passed out druggies at the wheel of unmoving cars running or not. You lack experience and understanding of what actually goes on out there and want to blame your police bogeymen
 
#165
#165
Rickyvol77 said:
“You cops” lol I have arrested people for DUI. I have let drunk people get a ride home before too. Context matters as much as what is actually going on. I’ve explained the reason this law was rewritten to cover this especially with number of passed out druggies at the wheel of unmoving cars running or not. You lack experience and understanding of what actually goes on out there and want to blame your police bogeymen
Click to expand...

Thanksgiving for letting me cop a ride home 😆
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rickyvol77
#167
#167
Rickyvol77 said:
Who said it was black or white? I said every scenario was different. I’m as explaining to the posters who lacked understanding about TN’s DUI TCA code and “how does this make any sense” but some think no one should ever be arrested, some think everyone should be arrested and one thinks being passed out drunk or high in public is no big deal if he was arrested for one crime but not the other
Click to expand...

You are purposefully being obtuse and not addressing my points. As to your last point, isn't that ridiculous for you to say? "Some people seem to care that they are getting charged with DUIs instead of public intoxication, just because they weren't driving!" One of those can **** someone's life up way more than the other, so why act like that's not a big deal?

If they were driving under the influence, charge them. If they weren't, they shouldn't be charged with... driving under the influence.
 
  • Like
Reactions: rjd970 and Rasputin_Vol
#168
#168
Rickyvol77 said:
Yea because it’s conspiracy theory BS. It’s almost as bad as your Pro Russian conspiracy stuff. And I like you and agree with you on a lot that you post, but sometimes you sound like a tinfoil hat guy
Click to expand...
Discernment and discretion... that's all anyone is asking for and you act like it is poison ivy or Kryptonite.
 
#170
#170
Unattainable 55MPG law...think about that comrades. Kills the personal combustion engine and here you are arguing who get a DL
 
  • Like
Reactions: Vol8188
#171
#171
GordonC said:
If that quote is true, I wonder what would happen if someone was outside the vehicle and had called a cab/uber and the cab/uber was late arriving and an officer got there first.
I'd like to think the officer would at least wait for the cab/uber to arrive.
Click to expand...
For some reason I read “luber” the first time I read your post. That made it more interesting. Lube always makes things more interesting.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Orangeburst and GordonC
#174
#174
Vol8188 said:
You made a thread today and abandoned it….where’d you go?
Click to expand...

You mean about Jesse Numbskull?

Meh, every time I point out something that is so obviously atrocious the same folks come in with the same bad analogies it just tuckers me out.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top