NorthDallas40
Displaced Hillbilly
- Joined
- Oct 3, 2014
- Messages
- 57,217
- Likes
- 83,342
Probably needs a thimbleful of PETN or the like, to detonate a chunk of C4.Yep. Thereโs a difference between fireworks going off (conflagration) and a high yield explosive (detonation). The fuel burn rate and the resulting shock wave speed.
As you probably know you can light Comp C4 on fire and it will just burn. Hit it with a big hammer.... . Thatโs why we need blasting caps or other precursor charges to set off high yield explosives.
You see the "dome". If this was AN, it had a lot of help.
I'm not EOD. Maybe you are. Maybe I'm wrong, but this looked military-grade to me. Fast.
You see the "dome". If this was AN, it had a lot of help.
I'm not EOD. Maybe you are. Maybe I'm wrong, but this looked military-grade to me. Fast.
1. EMP. A nuclear blast would have wiped out all tech anywhere close. Even if not physically destroyed.for the people saying "def not a nuke", how do you know? I know nothing about explosives and you guys seem certain
We have video from literally next door. A ground blast would have wiped that out.
Some years ago we got a university professor to test some catalyst samples for potential explosivity. She filled a brass cartridge half with PETN (pentaerythritol tetranitrate) and half with our catalyst sample and detonated, then made a qualitative judgement as to whether the degree of shattering of the brass casing was indicative of more energy release than what the PETN alone would do. Probably her biggest consulting client is the CIA...No idea honestly. I just know itโs relatively stable until itโs shocked. Unlike say nitroglycerin which is looking for an excuse to explode.