Too raw and roster is stacked ahead of him.
Say what you want but Barnes has done one hell of a job with this roster
I think hes a good example of what my stance has been on Barnes since early on...
Pons & Johnson are the 2 highest ranked guys on this team iirc, add in Kwe Parker to the discussion and youve got the 3 highest ranked guys Barnes has signed. Yet none of them have played meaningful minutes and to this point have been unable to beat out the developed and experienced 3 stars in front of them...why? This team just beat what is on paper probably the most talented team in the country in UK, why is that? The experience and development of our sophomores and juniors compared to their freshman?
Now devils advocate is this...ok we may be a 19, 20 or even 21 win team that gets a 6 seed in the tourney, but imagine how good we would be if those developed 3 stars started out as 4 stars? That is enticing and I get it, but lots of questions...do those guys play with the same effort as these 3*? Do they put in the extra work to develop like these 3*? Do they respond to the tough coaching? Do they stick it out or do they transfer when they arent getting minutes?
Barnes had to build a foundation, and he did that with lower ranked guys...by all accounts hes looking to add more talent out of the gate, so maybe he continues to model of developing guys but these guys start with more talent? In 2017 he added Pons, his highest ranked guy to date. 2018 could be Simons or Moore, both higher ranked than Pons. 2019 he has already added Top 125 commit Gaines, appears in good shape with Top 75 DJ Burns...there has been a lot of complaining about the recruiting first 3 years, but I think seeing what happened results wise in the first 3 years at Mississippi State, Auburn, Alabama is an example that maybe Barnes way of rebuilding is just as good or better?
Thats an honest question imo...Alabama and Mississippi State hired coaches the same year we hired Barnes, Auburn hired Pearl the year before....Barnes has coached 78 games at Tennessee...
Barnes: Currently 10-4(1-2) Overall 40-38(15-24)
Howland: Currently 13-2(1-1) Overall 43-35(14-24)
Johnson: Currently 9-6(1-2) Overall 46-36 (19-20)
Pearl(thru 78): Overall 36-45(19-30)
Obviously the other 3 coaches have recruited better than Barnes, but through the same number of games can anyone convincingly make a case that those schools were in a better spot going forward than Tennessee?