The worst part is that we are having a QB argument. The better answer would be if things were more settled. I suspect that Worley will still be the starter when all the dust settles. I won't be disappointed if I am wrong because I think the possible replacement will have beaten out a pretty good player.
But there WAS a difference in the whole team when Dooley (meant Worley... I have almost done that about a dozen times this year) went out. He has some leadership ability that was noticably absent after his injury. It is more a statement that none of the other 21 starters could provide it than Dobbs couldn't.
Maybe Worley had more of the "it" factor than some gave him credit for?
But there WAS a difference in the whole team when Dooley (meant Worley... I have almost done that about a dozen times this year) went out. He has some leadership ability that was noticably absent after his injury. It is more a statement that none of the other 21 starters could provide it than Dobbs couldn't.
Maybe Worley had more of the "it" factor than some gave him credit for?
Last edited: