VolsRule
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 3, 2007
- Messages
- 11,809
- Likes
- 1,083
saban will retire in a few years with alabama on top, with 5 or 6 national titles in his pocket and $50 million in the bank.
I have a question for you. When Alabama has the next inevitable down turn in their program, are you saying Saban (assuming he is still there) will "let" it happen?
Another silly hypothetical, but I will answer. No, Saban won't allow Bama to drift into mediocrity by becoming complacent. When Saban goes, Alabama will still be loaded.
Two different situations and more importantly, two completely different coaches
Alabama had a year where they started #3 and finished with 3 wins. You can't fall harder than that.And that brings us back around to delusional attitudes. UT whether we like or not does not have the recruiting power of Alabama and it never has. For that reason our "falls" from the top will tend to be greater than Alabama's (due to the talent gap) and when combined with unrealistic expectations you have the situation UT has been in for 5 years.
Yeah, those top 20 finishes probably got old for them during his last 4 years.
During the two best years of Fulmer's tenure, 97 and 98, Donnan was winning 10 and 9 games while playing in the same division as us and Florida. I'm not saying he was Nick Saban . . . but he wasn't exactly Sparky Woods either.
I think it was time for Fulmer to go in 2008, but I'll never get the mentality that some have that they need to minimize his accomplishments while he had it rolling.
Believe me when I tell you I am NOT satisfied with the current state of our program, but I am excited about the potential given what Jones is doing on the recruiting trail. Yeah, we better in 2007 than we are now. I agree with all of you on that issue, but that's not the point.
There was a tremendous amount of discontent in 2002 after the 8-5 year (it's incredible to even type that - most Tennessee fans would kill for an 8-5 year now).
It was the large number of non-competitive games, even against higher ranked teams, that built up against Fulmer.
Lloyd Carr is in the hall of fame, he was basically told to get out of Ann Arbor. Mack Brown and Phil Fulmer have basically the same résumé. If Brown doesn't get things cranked up, his ass is gone in December. Are Texas fans overreacting?
There's nothing magical about alabama---they were mediocre when Saban took the job and he's won 3 titles and will probably win #4 this year. If saban came to UT, the same thing would happen---he can recruit and win at any big time school with a lot of money.
They Still have the Alabama Machine and Brain Trust etc....not sure how much you know about the history of the SEC and college football. The Alabama booster organizations behind the program is the closest thing to the mafia in college sports. Look up Colliers magazine article and you get an idea just how long they been at this......dirtiest history in the SEC. Or really anything in college sports. They were down because their fans went nuts chasing off good coaches like we are starting to become I fear. However ultimately the Machine would not be denied. Saban is a great coach, but I wonder if he bothers to ask questions that should be asked...
Dirtiest history in college sports? They've got nothing on UK basketball.
And that brings us back around to delusional attitudes. UT whether we like or not does not have the recruiting power of Alabama and it never has. For that reason our "falls" from the top will tend to be greater than Alabama's (due to the talent gap) and when combined with unrealistic expectations you have the situation UT has been in for 5 years.
That's the problem -- preferring a "potential" that will never likely occur. The 90's ain't never coming back, and we traded being a good but not dominant program for being a truly irrelevant program with fans always hoping for "potential." I'll take 2000-2008 over 2009-present and over 1975-1988.
The irony was the reason for fans to be upset was because we otherwise over-performed during that era compared to now, so fans expected games to always be close and competitive, which is a rarity now.
# of Season Losses by 14 or More
2000-2008: 15 games (12% of all games)
2009-2013: 15 games (30% of all games)
When you consider we played more ranked opponents under Fulmer than we did recently (due to bowl games, SEC title appearances, and tougher non-conference schedules), we basically tripled the "embarrassing loss" factor after firing him.
Also consider this:
# of Upsets Over Higher Ranked Top-20 Foes
2000-2008: 9 (30% of the time against such foes)
2009-pres: 0 (0% of the time against such foes)
# Of Losses to Unranked Foes
2000-2008: 9 (12% of the time against such foes)
2009-pres: 10 (33% of the time against such foes)
He lost to Georgia Tech three years in a row. You can't do that at UGA and expect to keep your job.