DarthVisor
Belee dat
- Joined
- Jul 20, 2008
- Messages
- 5,154
- Likes
- 43
That's not the point. The point is that you would still be wallowing in mediocrity, because that is what Fulmer allowed UT football to sink to.
Tennessee Volunteers football - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Look at all the seasons that were 7 or 8 wins. There's a helluva lot of them. To think that Tennessee was always dominant is ignorant. Why can the guy that actually bettered the program to new heights?
Because he also helped bring it to new lows.Fulmer*isn't the answer, isn't going to be the coach at UT again and is doubtful to ever coach anywhere for that matter.Don't want him, don't need him, get over it and move on.
If you call winning the sec east every 2-3 years mediocrity.. Then yes, I'd like that please.
Tennessee Volunteers football - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Look at all the seasons that were 7 or 8 wins. There's a helluva lot of them. To think that Tennessee was always dominant is ignorant. Why can the guy that actually bettered the program to new heights?
Winning the East is good enough for a program like South Carolina, Kentucky, or Missouri. It's not good enough for a program like Tennessee. UT should be able to win at least one SEC title every ten years. We're going on fourteen years since UT last won one.
Nobody is saying that UT has always been dominant. However, UT has six national titles and thirteen SEC titles. It should expect more than what it got from Fulmer post-2001. UT started to go into a nose-dive after the 2001 season, and the signs for what was to come were there as early as December of 2001. Had Fulmer been axed sooner, UT may have already righted the ship.
4 of those titles were when every major publication claimed a title. So, in this era, we have 2. How many of those SEC titles were won before there was a championship game? Exactly.
And? You still claim them. Who awarded them is irrelevant. Did you have a point with the italicized part of your post? Again, nobody is denying that Fulmer did a lot of good things for UT. However, when other competent coaches started to enter the conference, it became clear that Fulmer was not near as good a coach as many have built him up to be.
He isnt coaching for the same reason Gruden isnt coaching
He's not "unemployed". Do some research and you'll find out he has a successful company.
He's unemployed because Arkansas wouldn't offer him a 2 year contract. Let me repeat that... Arkansas wouldn't hire him. He is washed up and has been for awhile hence why we ****canned him in the first place and why no other school wants him. I don't give 2****s that his BoJangles is selling lots of ��