no and there's a decade worth of work to back it up
Yea and we just lived 3 years of trying an up and comer experiment. You realize if we pick Strong, Fedora, Davis etc, out recruiting is done after this mess and fan base will be on pins and needles, then to top it off, we hire an unproven coach in the SEC to lead us? Aye-yie-yie
Yea and we just lived 3 years of trying an up and comer experiment. You realize if we pick Strong, Fedora, Davis etc, out recruiting is done after this mess and fan base will be on pins and needles, then to top it off, we hire an unproven coach in the SEC to lead us? Aye-yie-yie
So what? Fulmer failed for a decade before they finally got rid of him. He's gone, move on
That's just it. I was definitely gonna move on for Gruden but after this debacle it only solidifies the idea for me that Fulmer shoulda never been fired so we wouldn't have to go through this mess.
You say move on, but to who are we moving on to? From Dools to Fedora? hellz no
Don't be foolish, Dooley wasn't an "up and comer." He was a panicked hire by an idiot AD who should have just let Brown interim coach a year. NOBODY had Dooley on their radar at all. The rest of the coaches you mention are already tons better than Dooley ever was.
You realize if we go back to Fulmer, the fan base is probably going to be just as on pins and needles if not more? The SEC passed Fulmer by and it sure as heck hasn't gotten any easier since he left. I have way more hope in a guy like Strong than going back to Fulmer. It's not even close.
What's done is done, and you can't put the toothpaste back in the tube. And I think Fulmer would have been fired by now anyway had he survived 2008. Nothing suggests to me that we were on our way back up. Would we have been better? Marginally probably. I don't think he would have done any better than Kiffin in 2009. We likely would have done better than Dooley but I still think it would have been subpar and people would still have been screaming for him to be fired.
You forget the recruit class Fulmer had lined up b4 kiffin told them to scram. T Boyd to name just one.
I admit fuer got lazy in the later years, but you get elected to the college football hall of freakin because you can't coach.
Fulmer messed up when he hire that idiot clawson to run the offense
Because UT will pay more, it's the SEC, the ACC is hardly stable at the moment, and despite the last few years, UT is still a much better job than Louisville.
It's still preferable to move forward than to pull Fulmer out of the mothballs. Yes he's a HOF coach, who's best days are clearly behind him. You're not getting 1990s Fulmer back.
I think you just keep the offense as is.
Heard Tee wanted back in big orange country.
I look at it like this. Dooley had this UT team close to beating UGA, USCe, and Mizzou. Had we had a capable coach VS UF, and Vandy?? Who knows. Phil Fulmer is a very capable coach. Is he better than Dooley? NO QUESTION about it. Looking back, the close loss to LSU, UNC, and several others, Fulmer would have won those games with this Tennessee team. IMO, he makes an awful lot of sense right now. Hart should at least interview him and see if Chavis would return and or who Fulmer could land for OC. Don't short change the guy. If Hart was willing to give Gruden 2.5 million for our coordinators, give Fulmer the same. I think Fulmer would take the job for 2.5 million a year on a 5-6 year deal. Chavis could return with a 350,000.00 raise and Todd Monken would be my hire from Okie State at OC at more than double his current salary. If Fulmer wants the job, I would roll with Fulmer.
People are actually wanting to hire coaches who have won 5-10 games more than they lost? Coaches who have actually lost more than they have won? Fulmer has won 100 games more than he lost!! Seriously, let's get real!!