I keep laughing at the notion that the last 5 years proves we shouldn't have fired Fulmer; all it proves is the replacement hire has been seriously bungled.
If anything, the university was mismanaged from the top down for a looooooong time, and that includes having appropriate oversight in place during Fulmer's great decline. There is a reason they named the off-season misbehavior award after the man. Then the firing was a mess. The next two hires were a mess. But, God help us, Dave Hart seems to have found a steady footing, and Butch seems capable of building something we can be proud of.
The mismanagement doesn't just relate to football. We have a history of less-than- brillient people using the university as a stepping stone for their ridiculous political careers, and UT suffered for it.
Based on the current improvements in the facilities and what I have been reading in the Torchbearer, it seems like maybe we have found a groove. But it remains to be seen.
I'm not convinced there was a capable president of the University since Ed Bolling, and when I talked to Andy Holt's widow about Ed, she seemed to think the best thing about him was that he was "bull headed."
Long story short, I think Fulmer is correct that UT has had a long history of problems at the administrator level, but I don't think they were working against him. Instead, it seems more likely that they were ignoring him while he skated on by. So, blame them for nonfeasance instead of malfeasance, I guess.
The most interesting thing in the world to me would be an open and frank discussion between Fulmer and Jones comparing and contrasting the support they received from UT administration, and how they have gone about asking for and contributing to that support.