Sleegro
5⭐❤, Champion of Life, Brick, Realist
- Joined
- Oct 12, 2010
- Messages
- 12,860
- Likes
- 38,005
I don't know how you can say this kid isn't physically talented. He has SEC level size for an OLB and is strong enough to hold his own at nose tackle. If you believe his numbers he's an athletic freak. His weight room numbers compare well to some highly rated OL recruits in the class who are much bigger. And his vertical and 40 time would compete with a lot of DBs and running backs who are much smaller. He is raw and is playing out of position (which may speak to his competitive character) so yes he may be a little bit of a "reach". But physically and athletically I don't think you can say he's on a lower level than what those other schools are recruiting. The rest comes down to if you believe we have the coaches who can develop him.
We will run a 4-2-5 about 80% of the time. Also whenever we run a 3/4 one lb is blitzing so it will be the same... slight adjustment
Theres no way to know if its incorrect either, but how many national championship teams had butch been a part of?
Nice optimistic take and all, but everyone was (wrongly) lauding Butchs identification of 3 stars about 18 months ago. There is no way to know if this comparison is correct.
Nice pessimistic take. Yeah I get it and yer not wrong that people said that about butch too. But just because it was wrong when said about butch doesn't mean it will be wrong about Pruitt. Yer right that there is no way to know. Some of us are willing to give him the benefit of the doubt until he proves us wrong. People on here were also talking smack about kirby at georgia before last season too and now there is no hope that we can ever compete with them again and the best we can ever hope for is second in the east. I'm just glad we get to find out soon. Thanks for always being there to try to tamper the excitement though. These little debates are fun even though nothing new is ever really said. You could copy and paste both sides of this argument into every 3 star thread.
Commitment,
excitement,
"this seems like a reach only a 3 star" ,
"I trust the coaches over sites",
"the same thing was said about butch and dooley",
"what about Sutton",
"they can't all be diamonds in the rough",
"he'll get bumped",
"they never get bumped",
"yer such a negavol",
"I don't do blind faith after the last coach", etc.
Absolutely right, and none, because Butch was a terrible coach. But Pruitt didnt exactly make his bones identifying 3 stars, so while the Great Butch vs. Pruitt 3 star debate has no definitive answer right now, the number of NCs each have probably isnt the best argument when put into context.
Absolutely right, and none, because Butch was a terrible coach. But Pruitt didnt exactly make his bones identifying 3 stars, so while the Great Butch vs. Pruitt 3 star debate has no definitive answer right now, the number of NCs each have probably isnt the best argument when put into context.
With half the peoples opinions on here we won't ever have good players unless we only recruit 5* players..... This kid is a high 3 star who didn't camp much who will probably be a 4 star. Seems like a great get to me.
You are correct. The thing about recruiting at the highest level is that somebody has to be the first. If you wait until a player's offer list is "impressive", you run the risk of being too far behind at the start.
This staff knows what good players look like. I trust them over a couple of guys on some website.
He said same "exact"?
But on this kid. What don't you like about a 250 lb kid who has a 39" vertical and a 4.6 40 (if accurate) and those weight lifting numbers?
If he's playing out of position for the good of his team then that could be the primary thing keeping his rating low. Or... he could be a dud. Either way, the measurables are there and I kind of like that he's willing to sacrifice his recruiting publicity to help his team.
By that logic, every team runs the same defense with slight adjustments.
Its not the same stuff as last year... there is stuff we are running now that Only about 3 or 4 teams in the country runs... the slight adjustment is just what body type do you want in those spots... whenever you watch us this year you will see those same OLB in a 3-4 bump up to a DE on the line... in a 4-2-5... what we line up in doesnt really make the defense what it is... the defensive identity of a team comes from the techniques and scheme that it possesses...Just because you have them lined up a certain way doesnt mean its the same scheme. The responsibilities of the 3 down linemen in a 3-4 is different than the 4 in a 4-3. Just facts. There are 4-3 DEs that dont fit as 3-4 OLBs...namely Derek Barnett! So seeing 4 on the line and a nickel back and maintaining that were running the same weak azz shizz as last year, makes you look like a hack! And I know youre better than that.