Nothing wrong with that. I think when someone has outpatient surgery for a couple of days they should have a hundred grand in medical bills, and neurosurgeons should make a million dollar a year. Seems completely fair to me.
100 grand for outpatient surgery?
Why does it have to be fair?
I would hope he would make a million a year he would pay half in taxes and another quarter of a million for insurance.
The poor fella is only left with 250,000 to live on.
Nothing wrong with that. I think when someone has outpatient surgery for a couple of days they should have a hundred grand in medical bills, and neurosurgeons should make a million dollar a year. Seems completely fair to me.
How do you have outpatient surgery for a couple of days?
Neurosurgeon make a million a year? If he saw 20 patients in a week and charged each a $1000 then he would make a million. Seems reasonable enough to me. Oh yeah remember he has to pay for assistants, office space, high tech equipment, etc...But you would rather give him a capped salary. Fine you'll get capped service in return. You'll get a neurosurgeon that graduated from the Bahamas with a B average and has no idea how to fix your problem.
My neighbor had outpatient surgery for a blocked artery he spent 3 days at the hospital.
And yes a coworker's wife worked for a neurosurgeon who made a million/yr.
yes we only want people getting into medicine because they want to make lots of money, not practice medicine and help people who are sick, but mainly to make money.
Your missing the whole point, and that is cost controls need to be established for health care.
Whether you agree on 120k, 100k, etc thats just a number I wrote for an example. The point is without cost controls health care costs are never going to be limited or managable.
There are literally thousands and thousands of people being rejected for medical school every year. I believe the majority of them do not want to go to medical school simply to enrich themselves. They have a desire to help sick people get better. I don't think simply setting cost controls on doctor's salaries is going to destroy the desire of the majority of them to go to medical school.
No one is saying doctors shouldn't be well paid, its simply limits to how much they can make.
First, there is a reason many are rejected - they can't do it! I don't doubt many are completely altrustic and sincerely want to help. That still doesn't make them qualified. I don't believe we have shortage of doctors in this country (nurses? yes).
Cost controls are in place - Insurance companies use them (yet ironically contribute to healthcare costs) and the government uses them extensively through medicare and medicaid.
As in the case with the gas/oil industry - it is much more complicated than doctors overcharging or Exxon over charging. Cost controls attack symptoms rather than sources of cost. They are a short-term, feel-good measure. Since they do not address the real reasons for cost increases and thus price increases, they simply serve to squeeze incentives out of the providers. When cost controls aren't as dynamic as true costs; providers are driven out of business - supply shrinks and the situation worsens.
So you saying cost controls are in place now? I couldn't disagree more.
Costs are out of control and the U.S. system is the most expensive system in the world. While 42 million people don't have insurance and access to it.
Exxon made more money last year then any company in history. Yet you believe they are not overcharging? You must believe they are the most efficient well run company in the world. I certainly don't believe that. A large part of their business is simply digging a hole in the ground and pumping oil out of it. Yet that incredible technological innovation they have become the wealthiest corporations in the world?
And as I said, walk into most of the poor souls homes and you will find cell, cable and a bunch of other unnecessary crap, meaning they have made choices on what is more important. Luxury items they have deemed to be more essential than healthcare.
It's called risk and reward. The cost to attend medical school coupled with liability insurance, licensing, etc. would effectively turn that 120K into about 30K a year. Tending bar would be alot better risk/reward equation.
Someone mentioned doctors in India. I see classes full of doctors from India coming to the US to get a Masters degree in Public Health because they will make more money than they did as a doctor! (and MPHs are highly paid). This is repeated at universities across the country. Being a doctor is a highly demanding and stressful job. I don't begrudge them their salary one bit.
You are seriously deluded if you think most people that don't have healthcare have chosen cell phones and luxury items over health insurance. We're all lucky that the idea of not being able to afford health insurance sounds so absurd, but the fact of the matter is that a large percentage of the U.S. population can't afford it.
More from th same article:
Check out the shortage of doctors in rural America. How is the nurse shortage in his part of the country?
The way you're characterizing this is a bit misleading. The reason that they're coming to the U.S. to get a Masters degree in Public Health is because they will be paid in U.S. dollars here versus Rupee in India. Do you care to guess how much 1 Rupee is worth? Try 2.44 cents. Why do you think all the U.S. companies are exporting so many jobs to India? Cheap labor. It's not that India doesn't pay its doctors extremely well compared to other professions. It's the value of their currency that has India's people (in all professions, not just doctors) coming to the United States.
Wow, as simple as this is, why don't you get into the business? Then you can give your gas away while breaking even or losing?
But obviously oil companies aren't trying to stick it to the consumer, that must be a misprint.DeCota and Oyster see a more sinister motive: If the dealers like them leave, a company like Shell can run its stations with its own employees and set its own pump prices. "That way they really are controlling it from the well head to the gas pump,'' says DeCota. "Once the gas companies get control, you are going to pay the price.''
Must not be too much of a shortage considering the AMA doesn't allow people from India, or Canada or any other country to come here and practice medicine or nursing.
Of course, its perfectly fine for someone to come here from India and be a computer programmer or an electrical engineer, and no one questions their qualifications. Funny how that is.
Please don't tell me how they are not as educated in countries like India, its much more competitive to get in college in India then here.
if you trying to suggest that oil companies are the most profitable corporations in the world because they are the best run, most productive, or their technological innovation that's laughable.
They dont even design the wells that are being used, they buy those from manufacturers. They simply get drilling rights and use their geologists and test wells to determine where to drill.
Simply taking the oil out of the ground, oil that they don't even own, and bring it to the consumer makes them the richest corporations in the world? And you don't they might be overcharging the consumer? Oil they dont even own for the most part but is on aother countries land or someone's personal property.
Read this article about how shell is trying to control from the drill to the pump and squeeze out the little guy so they can completely control prices:
Dealer prices gas over $4 in protest / He says tactics used by Shell are unfair to operators
But obviously oil companies aren't trying to stick it to the consumer, that must be a misprint.
By the way am I the only one on this board who is required to cite sources to support my opinion?