KiffinKiller
We are Delusional
- Joined
- Jan 13, 2010
- Messages
- 4,448
- Likes
- 2
You were defending your post defending Beck. I don't think he advocates violence - but I do think he's a nutjob. At one point on his show he was comparing everything he could to Hiter/nazi party.
What drives me nuts with Beck is I often agree with him, but he doesn't go deep enough (maybe because he can't). Instead of explaining why Thomas Jefferson was right about something he'll just say "Thomas Jefferson said this, therefore it's right" as if everything the founders did was consistent and proper. Instead of Beck simply saying, "it's unconstitional" he should explain why rule of law is important.
Because of the lack of substance when Beck invokes the words "founders" and "constitution", people who don't like Beck's ideas start to devalue the founders and the constitution.
His show felt like the political pundit version of the teletubies, it was entertainment. I want the number of his acting coach.
Yeah, but you claimed he's made incendiary comments. I think he's a nut myself, but I don't see him inciting people to riot. You think it's justifiable to "pie" and shout-down those who make incendiary comments? What if it were Al Sharpton making the incendiary comments? Would you condone college students not allowing him to speak?
My bad. You used the above bolded phrase as a replacement for incendiary. You're right, he hasn't to my knowledge called outright for violent acts but his speech does qualify as incendiary.
What incendiary claims has he made? I've seen his tv show and heard his radio broadcast a few times and have never heard him say anything that made me say, "Wow, that guy is extreme". The way he presents topics is goofy and stupid, but I've never known him to be overly controversial.
Incendiary Claims. You have a few examples?
Trying to stall while you frantically search Google for Beck quotes?
You are just as insightful as LG. Care to fill us in on any of the instances where Beck has used incendiary speech?
Posted via VolNation Mobile
But we've already discussed how any particular figure that has supporters is an incendiary figure. That is not really the damnable charge that you are trying to use it as.
What drives me nuts with Beck is I often agree with him, but he doesn't go deep enough (maybe because he can't). Instead of explaining why Thomas Jefferson was right about something he'll just say "Thomas Jefferson said this, therefore it's right" as if everything the founders did was consistent and proper. Instead of Beck simply dismissing liberal agenda by saying, "it's unconstitional" he should explain why rule of law is important.
Because of the lack of substance when Beck invokes the words "founders" and "constitution", people who don't like Beck's ideas start to devalue the founders and the constitution.
Seems you saw it as a damnable charge that needed your defense. And since it appears being indendiary can be accomplished by anyone talking to anyone eles, why so upset at Beck being labeled as such?
So, like everything Beck says, I was right in my particular usage of incendiary?
Beck is incendiary in that he excites his supporters. He is not incendiary by way of insighting civil unrest.
Those are two valid definitions of the word. I looked at the context of what LG was saying, and assumed he meant the version with a negative connotation. I was simply being silly with my example of Richard Simmons being incendiary.