Gun control debate (merged)

[kiddiedoc]

Yep, I remember when loothervol got such a beat down that he said he would quit posting in this thread.

Was that the 800-1000 rd/minute debate?

 

[luthervol]

Yep, I remember when loothervol got such a beat down that he said he would quit posting in this thread.

Odd, I don't.
But what you guys misperceive as a beatdown, is actually just a bunch of flatlanders tickling each other and giggling.
Rather amusing, at least until the incessant giggling becomes annoying.

 

[luthervol]

I can't imagine that working out real well for him. I'm sure he thinks he will be one of the "chosen ones" that the government will protect and shield from the riff raff like us common folk.

Good god you guys have clinical levels of delusion and paranoia.

 

[kiddiedoc]

It's just like the CV19 thread: prove someone a total d-a-, they go away for awhile, then they come back later as if nothing had been learned, spouting off about masks or boosters or assault rifles or nuclear bombs or whatever.

 

[hndog609]

Was that the 800-1000 rd/minute debate?

Maybe trying to redefine how a firearm functions by something other than the firearm's function? He has so many absurdities in this thread.

 

[luthervol]

It's just like the CV19 thread: prove someone a total d-a-, they go away for awhile, then they come back later as if nothing bad been learned, spouting off about masks or boosters or assault rifles or nuclear bombs or whatever.

lol.....It is similar in that some are self delusional when assessing their own posting.

 

[kiddiedoc]

lol.....It is similar in that some are self delusional when assessing their own posting.

So what are you offering now? Are we back to "x rounds in y time," tanks and nuclear bombs, or do you just want the government to disarm us?

 

[85SugarVol]

I have never once in my life supported anything that denies a person's right to keep and bear arms.

Except the firearms deemed to dangerous to possess.

And when asked “what then” if removing those too dangerous to possess doesn’t yield the desired results - you have responded “we’ll cross that bridge if we get there”.

 

[LouderVol]

I stopped reading after your first 7 words because they are totally wrong and completely unfounded.
It just proves to me that you have processed little, if anything, of what I have said.

I have never once in my life supported anything that denies a person's right to keep and bear arms.

so you are fine with them buying an automatic assault weapon? Or if they had one before the ban went into place they should be allowed to keep it as is with no government hastle? what about people keeping war loot, should those be demilitarized?

what about taking people's gold so that FDR could push his changes?

you have made it clear if it serves the "greater good" you are fine with it. you haven't offered much if anything on defining whose good or whose greater.

 

[LouderVol]

So you support government theft. Thanks for clarifying that.

he will just redefine everything he supports so that it isn't a problem to his world view.

 

[luthervol]

So what are you offering now? Are we back to "x rounds in y time," tanks and nuclear bombs, or do you just want the government to disarm us?

x rounds in y minutes (you guys never shut that down in the least)
x purchases in y time
The line between weapons that are legal for the general public to purchase and own, and those that are illegal (mustard gas)
Background checks
Waiting periods
Mental health restrictions

BTW, I'm not going to be debating any of these.

 

[LouderVol]

x rounds in y minutes (you guys never shut that down in the least)
x purchases in y time
The line between weapons that are legal for the general public to purchase and own, and those that are illegal (mustard gas)
Background checks
Waiting periods
Mental health restrictions

BTW, I'm not going to be debating any of these.

so in other words, you do support the government robbing your neighbors.

 

[PEPPERJAX]

x rounds in y minutes (you guys never shut that down in the least)
x purchases in y time
The line between weapons that are legal for the general public to purchase and own, and those that are illegal (mustard gas)
Background checks
Waiting periods
Mental health restrictions

BTW, I'm not going to be debating any of these.

This saddens me buddy. I was hoping to receive a top notch level of enlightenment.

 

[kiddiedoc]

BTW, I'm not going to be debating any of these.

This is the smartest thing you've ever said.

 

[kiddiedoc]

Oh, and I'll add "mustard gas" to the List of Absurdities.

 

[kiddiedoc]

x rounds in y minutes -- already in place
x purchases in y time -- stupid, no known benefit
The line between weapons that are legal for the general public to purchase and own, and those that are illegal (mustard gas) -- already in place
Background checks -- already in place
Waiting periods -- stupid, no known benefit. However, this would be great for tattoos.
Mental health restrictions -- already in place

 

[kiddiedoc]

Out of curiosity, why did you not mention restrictions on felons and drug users, as these account for the most gun violence?

 

[luthervol]

so in other words, you do support the government robbing your neighbors.

No. You guys reach some really stupid conclusions. I could lead you down a path which could possibly make you aware of that fact, but it's proven to be mostly futile in the past, and you guys have provided absolutely no reason to think this time would be any different.

 

[PEPPERJAX]

No. You guys reach some really stupid conclusions. I could lead you down a path which could possibly make you aware of that fact, but it's proven to be mostly futile in the past, and you guys have provided absolutely no reason to think this time would be any different.

The problems is that you lead down a path full of confusion and treachery!

 

[luthervol]

This saddens me buddy. I was hoping to receive a top notch level of enlightenment.

It's there for the taking......but receiving is your choice.

 

[luthervol]

Out of curiosity, why did you not mention restrictions on felons and drug users, as these account for the most gun violence?

More than happy to add those.

 

[85SugarVol]

x rounds in y minutes (you guys never shut that down in the least)
x purchases in y time
The line between weapons that are legal for the general public to purchase and own, and those that are illegal (mustard gas)
Background checks
Waiting periods
Mental health restrictions

BTW, I'm not going to be debating any of these.

And if these common sense reforms don’t yield the desired result?

What then?

 

[luthervol]

The problems is that you lead down a path full of confusion and treachery!

The proverbial "eye of the beholder" conundrum.

More reason not to travel it again.

 

[volfanhill]

The moron complex is much stronger than I thought.

WTF do you think the world would be like in 2 weeks if the power went out tomorrow?

At two weeks I would probably be sick of the freeze dried beef stroganoff that the bucket swears is just like moms

 

[marcusluvsvols]

I've said it before...the extent to which someone is anti-gun is overwhelmingly inversely proportional to the extent of their knowledge of the subject.

and this thread proves it

.