Gun control debate (merged)

I've said it before...the extent to which someone is anti-gun is overwhelmingly inversely proportional to the extent of their knowledge of the subject.
I'm guessing that the extent to which someone is anti-child porn is overwhelmingly inversely proportional to the extent of their knowledge of the subject.

It's a really dumb point.
 
I'm guessing that the extent to which someone is anti-child porn is overwhelmingly inversely proportional to the extent of their knowledge of the subject.

It's a really dumb point.
There is an astonishingly strong correlation with people that are staunchly anti-gun and them being catastrophically ignorant on the topic. I'd like to take credit for that being some insightful observation but in fact quite openly apparent.
 
  • Like
Reactions: marcusluvsvols
I'm guessing that the extent to which someone is anti-child porn is overwhelmingly inversely proportional to the extent of their knowledge of the subject.

It's a really dumb point.

How much research should it take for the average person to be anti-child porn?
 
I was this many days old when I watched video evidence of a pistol with 5.7x28mm piercing level2, 2a, and level3 plates. Already love the pistol my buddy has...love the 21+ round capacity, love the 2000fps+ muzzle velocity, love the ~30% less recoil and muzzle climb compared to most 9mm pistols....but mostly love the fact that using my friends pistol that i dont even have much practice with, I can damn near drive nails with it at 10 to 15 yards and it isnt even mine. Its not a matter of "headshot or center mass?" But rather " Right eye or left?".

I know the ammo is expensive. I know he paid $1200 for that pistol which is also expensive. I want very few things in life for myself...but I want 1 of those and a few hundred rounds. So much fun to shoot. Probably give one to my daughter in a couple years when she turns 18...after i teach her to drive tacks with it.

 
Last edited:
There is an astonishingly strong correlation with people that are staunchly anti-gun and them being catastrophically ignorant on the topic. I'd like to take credit for that being some insightful observation but in fact quite openly apparent.
Same with child pron.

You don't need to know a lot about child porn to know less is better.
 
  • Like
Reactions: WoodsmanVol
Same with child pron.

You don't need to know a lot about child porn to know less is better.
So how much knowledge does it take to know water is wet? Fire is hot? Again, this is nukes and sarin level stupid.

Look man, the MFing POTUS tried selling the idea that just because it's fired from an AR a bullet moves 5x the velocity of any other gun. That 100% is either something said by an idiot for the purpose of swaying other idiots or an intentional lie for the purpose of swaying idiots. It's not only so factually incorrect on it's face it causes anyone with a clue to burst into laughter it fails in almost every aspect of ballistics even tangentially associated. Biden alone (and he's not remotely alone of course) would prove my point.
 
Same with child pron.

You don't need to know a lot about child porn to know less is better.
The better comparison would be pedophilia to shooting someone.

owning guns is like having pictures of your 18yo+ girl friend in a bikini. some guys have more than one "girl friend" but they are all ok with the arrangement. as evidenced by this threads number of water related incidents the comparison to guns and women in bikinis may be pretty apt.
 
  • Like
Reactions: marcusluvsvols
I'm guessing that the extent to which someone is anti-child porn is overwhelmingly inversely proportional to the extent of their knowledge of the subject.

It's a really dumb point.
OK, this is all time.

Seriously, you're the worst troll ever to grace the PF.

You even making an asinine comparison to gun owners makes you not only an idiot, but also fair game for a beating.
 
I was this many days old when I watched video evidence of a pistol with 5.7x28mm piercing level2, 2a, and level3 plates. Already love the pistol my buddy has...love the 21+ round capacity, love the 2000fps+ muzzle velocity, love the ~30% less recoil and muzzle climb compared to most 9mm pistols....but mostly love the fact that using my friends pistol that i dont even have much practice with, I can damn near drive nails with it at 10 to 15 yards and it isnt even mine. Its not a matter of "headshot or center mass?" But rather " Right eye or left?".

I know the ammo is expensive. I know he paid $1200 for that pistol which is also expensive. I want very few things in life for myself...but I want 1 of those and a few hundred rounds. So much fun to shoot. Probably give one to my daughter in a couple years when she turns 18...after i teach her to drive tacks with it.



$650 on sale, bro
Plus ammo is down to $0.50/rd
 
  • Like
Reactions: marcusluvsvols
OK, this is all time.

Seriously, you're the worst troll ever to grace the PF.

You even making an asinine comparison to gun owners makes you not only an idiot, but also fair game for a beating.
I remember watching this a long time ago and thinking “Who in the hell is this guy? I mean, how ridiculous would you have to be to make such an insane argument??”

I’ve never been more convinced that the teacher in this video is Luther.

 
  • Like
Reactions: kiddiedoc
With child porn the preferred amount X would be zero.

Are you saying you would prefer there be zero guns in the world as well?

But guns cause no harm unlike child porn.

Guns are now comparable to child pron

Yeah, you're getting shot
At no point did I say anything about guns and child porn being comparable. You guys are nuts and can't read for sh!t.
I was responding to whoever had the "brilliant" observation that there was an inverse correlation between a person's gun knowledge and them being anti-gun. It's a stupid point, It's a childishly obvious point, and it means absolutely nothing. I highlighted that by comparing it to knowledge of child porn and being anti-child porn.

I hope to hell you guys can comprehend the difference; if not, it explains why these debates go nowhere -
and it ain't on me.
 
Last edited:
With child porn the preferred amount X would be zero.

Are you saying you would prefer there be zero guns in the world as well?
As usual, you guys Chubby Checker everything into MAGA talking points. He's talking child porn, you want to make it about gun control.

Thine forward voice, now, is to speak well of thine friend; thine backward voice is to utter foul speeches and to detract.

 
  • Like
Reactions: VOLS INC.
As usual, you guys Chubby Checker everything into MAGA talking points. He's talking child porn, you want to make it about gun control.

Thine forward voice, now, is to speak well of thine friend; thine backward voice is to utter foul speeches and to detract.

Yes. He’s talking about child porn in a thread regarding gun control.

Thank you for your contribution to this discussion. Seriously.
 
Thanks Doc! My buddy has the Belgian variety but not the newest 1 in the video. Is Palmetto acceptable though? I know they're not gonna be quite as good as the high dollar brands...but are they pretty reliable? I have heard about bad ARs from P.A. but they were also probably $400 or $500 brand new and I also know that "AR" is really just a platform or type of rifle...that everything from caliber to barrel length, buttstock to sights can be completely different from 1 AR to the next...do you have any Palmetto stuff? I appreciate any and all info from you guys. Thanks bud

Edit NM...thats a Keltec so not made by them in house anyway. Oh my that pistol holds 50 rounds lmao! So you can go from 55 grain barely subsonic to 40 grain 2000+fps rounds that tumble after impact. That video showed 12in penetration in ballistic gel after going thru lvl3 plate with the 40 grain. I bet its a tack driver like the Belgian pistol too with that long barrel. Thanks Doc I want 1 badly
 
Last edited:
I've said it before...the extent to which someone is anti-gun is overwhelmingly inversely proportional to the extent of their knowledge of the subject.

I'm guessing that the extent to which someone is anti-child porn is overwhelmingly inversely proportional to the extent of their knowledge of the subject.

It's a really dumb point.
Quick recap for the hard of thinking.

Does anyone see where I made a comparison between child-porn and guns?
 
Quick recap for the hard of thinking.

Does anyone see where I made a comparison between child-porn and guns?
Was this intended for me because I don't don't give two shizzes about your child porn comparison. In fact I've given you an (stated thus because there could be more) example from the top office in the whole nation of catastrophic stupid being sold as gun knowledge. I stand by my quote with plenty of vetting in support. It just adds that special little something when you can cite the POTUS backing up your argument.
 

VN Store



Back
Top