Gun control debate (merged)

Don't know if this is really 2A as much as administrative law??? ATF overstepped their legislative bounds. Glad to see that. Too many 3-letter agencies do that.
It's this ^. A bump stock equipped rifle does not definitionally meet the criteria of being a "machine gun" and the ATF doesn't have the authority to just say "Well, close enough." and call it good. Now that doesn't mean they couldn't go back and amend the current definition to include something like "and to include any other modification/addition, irrespective of the actual fire control mechanism, that by it's design is intended to encourage a sequence of firing functionally analogous to a "machine gun"'. This would put a bump stock under the same umbrella as an "auto sear".
 
We wouldn't want to do anything to inconvenience mass murderers in America....I believe the Las Vegas shooter---you remember that
"responsible gun owner" who killed, what, 70 people and injured more than 200, used bump stocks.


 
  • Like
Reactions: lawgator1
We wouldn't want to do anything to inconvenience mass murderers in America....I believe the Las Vegas shooter---you remember that
"responsible gun owner" who killed, what, 70 people and injured more than 200, used bump stocks.



Do you have a minimum lead/mercury intake per day to maintain your level of stupid? If you think firearms are less regulated than female plumbing then whatever amount of abuse you receive for that take will surely be less than you deserve.
 
We wouldn't want to do anything to inconvenience mass murderers in America....I believe the Las Vegas shooter---you remember that
"responsible gun owner" who killed, what, 70 people and injured more than 200, used bump stocks.



That weapon of war is not nearly as frightening as it could have been.

Where is the high-capacity banana clip?
Where is the heat-seeking death dot?
Where is multi-use tactical strap?
 
  • Like
Reactions: GroverCleveland
We wouldn't want to do anything to inconvenience mass murderers in America....I believe the Las Vegas shooter---you remember that
"responsible gun owner" who killed, what, 70 people and injured more than 200, used bump stocks.



I bet we could almost eliminate abortive procedures with a BGC and 3 day waiting period prior to intercourse.
 
It's this ^. A bump stock equipped rifle does not definitionally meet the criteria of being a "machine gun" and the ATF doesn't have the authority to just say "Well, close enough." and call it good. Now that doesn't mean they couldn't go back and amend the current definition to include something like "and to include any other modification/addition, irrespective of the actual fire control mechanism, that by it's design is intended to encourage a sequence of firing functionally analogous to a "machine gun"'. This would put a bump stock under the same umbrella as an "auto sear".
"They" need to be elected............. not career b'crat activists.
 
We wouldn't want to do anything to inconvenience mass murderers in America....I believe the Las Vegas shooter---you remember that
"responsible gun owner" who killed, what, 70 people and injured more than 200, used bump stocks.



Obviously, the above is not regulated from posting on the internet.
 
We wouldn't want to do anything to inconvenience mass murderers in America....I believe the Las Vegas shooter---you remember that
"responsible gun owner" who killed, what, 70 people and injured more than 200, used bump stocks.



There's a method outlined to where you can change both of those. Good luck
 
Calling out the conservative political hacks posing as SCOTUS justices---changing their past opinions in this gun case.


I literally did a better job summarizing the situation in this post.

It's this ^. A bump stock equipped rifle does not definitionally meet the criteria of being a "machine gun" and the ATF doesn't have the authority to just say "Well, close enough." and call it good. Now that doesn't mean they couldn't go back and amend the current definition to include something like "and to include any other modification/addition, irrespective of the actual fire control mechanism, that by it's design is intended to encourage a sequence of firing functionally analogous to a "machine gun"'. This would put a bump stock under the same umbrella as an "auto sear".
 

VN Store



Back
Top