Half Of Americans Expect A Second U.S. Civil War Within Years. More Than 40% Agree With The Great Replacement Theory.

#178
#178
Rooster1 said:
You cannot own an operable tank, which I clearly stated. You also cannot own an operable cannon, or a military style machine gun, like an M60, nor can you own any weapon deemed manufactured for warfare. Now, a semi automatic assault rifle is the question here, which most (over 65%) of the nation feels should be classified as such since it serves that purpose well but is not needed for any other purpose that a handgun, hunting rifle or shotgun does not already fill. Nice try.
Click to expand...

You can own an operable tank and cannon and you can own an operable M60 machine gun. I own an M9 bayonet and (used to, damn flood) a Remington 700 with the same Leopold scope used by Army snipers until the mid 2000s. I also (used to) own a Remington 870 12 gauge which again is used by the Army. Then if you want to discuss the Baretta 9mm or Colt 45 pistols that any civilian can own we can.

If over 65% of the nation feels semi-atomic rifles should be banned then that should be enough to get an amendment to the constitution passed, get to work or STFU.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1vol8, 85SugarVol, 82_VOL_83 and 5 others
#179
#179
KB5252 said:
I challenge you to actually go and look at what those bills actually say instead of slurping the fear porn. If you did, and had the slightest degree of intellectual honesty, you couldn't walk away thinking they did anything other than lie to you.

The right actually most closely resembles the Clinton era policy wise. Unless you think he was radical right I'm not sure what to say to you. Perhaps it's you and the left that has swung radically.
Click to expand...
Bubba Clinton

Same one who gave the world “don’t ask, don’t tell”
 
#180
#180
hog88 said:
You can own an operable tank and cannon and you can own an operable M60 machine gun. I own an M9 bayonet and (used to, damn flood) a Remington 700 with the same Leopold scope used by Army snipers until the mid 2000s. I also (used to) own a Remington 870 12 gauge which again is used by the Army. Then if you want to discuss the Baretta 9mm or Colt 45 pistols that any civilian can own we can.

If over 65% of the nation feels semi-atomic rifles should be banned then that should be enough to get an amendment to the constitution passed, get to work or STFU.
Click to expand...
“
The National Firearms Act (NFA) regulates the sale of destructive devices and several other categories of guns. It also established the Federal Firearms Licensing Center (FFLC) for issuing permits and licenses. The cannons and machine guns on tanks are considered destructive devices. A destructive device is any artillery weapon or firearm with a bore that measures over half an inch, except for most types of shotguns and rifles.

Before obtaining a destructive device, the buyer needs an FEP. The permit is issued by the FFLC, which is a department of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF). The permits are primarily used for the sale of large fireworks for individuals that plan on using the fireworks for a public display. Civilians are unlikely to obtain an FEP for an operational cannon or machine gun without demonstrating a specific use, such as a controlled historical reenactment or research.
Federal explosives licenses (FELs) are typically only issued to manufacturers, importers, and dealers to facilitate the sale of operational tanks.”

Same for any weapon of warfare, like a bazzoka, a working cannon etc…etc…etc….Do some research before blowing hot air next time, makes you look ignorant. Try putting an M60 machine gun in your vehicle sometime and getting through a routine traffic stop.
 
Last edited:
#183
#183
utvolpj said:
This isn't true and is not happening
Click to expand...
Have you been to a gun show? It absolutely is true. “Gun shows” are a legal loophole for the purchase of firearms without background checks. It has been an issue debated for a long while.
 
#184
#184
Rooster1 said:
Have you been to a gun show? It absolutely is true. “Gun shows” are a legal loophole for the purchase of firearms without background checks. It has been an issue debated for a long while.
Click to expand...
You're talking about the private sale of goods. It takes place all over. People aren't setting up booths at gun shows to traffic weapons. Gun dealers still have to run checks. It's been debated because it's intentionally misrepresented by gun grabbers
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1vol8, 82_VOL_83, MemphisVol77 and 3 others
#187
#187
Civil War 2: Fat Asses that get out of breath walking down the driveway vs assholes that still get shot

Arm yourselves, liberals.
 
#188
#188
ClearwaterVol said:
Neither party has all the answers and there has to be some compromise otherwise we are headed down a dark path. I do believe that there is somebody who can unite us again, though I don't see him or her out there currently.
Click to expand...
The problems weren't created by a single person, and I don't see someone being able to undo them.
 
#191
#191
Rooster1 said:
“
The National Firearms Act (NFA) regulates the sale of destructive devices and several other categories of guns. It also established the Federal Firearms Licensing Center (FFLC) for issuing permits and licenses. The cannons and machine guns on tanks are considered destructive devices. A destructive device is any artillery weapon or firearm with a bore that measures over half an inch, except for most types of shotguns and rifles.

Before obtaining a destructive device, the buyer needs an FEP. The permit is issued by the FFLC, which is a department of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF). The permits are primarily used for the sale of large fireworks for individuals that plan on using the fireworks for a public display. Civilians are unlikely to obtain an FEP for an operational cannon or machine gun without demonstrating a specific use, such as a controlled historical reenactment or research.
Federal explosives licenses (FELs) are typically only issued to manufacturers, importers, and dealers to facilitate the sale of operational tanks.”

Same for any weapon of warfare, like a bazzoka, a working cannon etc…etc…etc….Do some research before blowing hot air next time, makes you look ignorant.
Click to expand...

There are thousands of operational cannons all over this country that are privately owned (legally) without a permit. And you can own a fully functioning tank, all you have to do is pay the $200 tax and pass the BGC. Same with fully automatic machine guns. Educate yourself a bit.

Americans Can Still Buy Cannon | National Review

National Firearms Act | Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1vol8, 85SugarVol, 82_VOL_83 and 1 other person
#193
#193
hog88 said:
There are thousands of operational cannons all over this country that are privately owned (legally) without a permit. And you can own a fully functioning tank, all you have to do is pay the $200 tax and pass the BGC. Same with fully automatic machine guns. Educate yourself a bit.

Americans Can Still Buy Cannon | National Review

National Firearms Act | Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives
Click to expand...
You literally have no idea. A civilian will not be issued a permit to own a functional tank, cannon or weapon of warfare. Read the rule.
 
#194
#194
Rooster1 said:
There are not open borders, you knew that and purposely wrote the opposite. Going after assault rifles isn’t the same as going after your guns, but you knew that also. Going after assault rifles is like outlawing citizens from owning an operable tank, or a bazooka, or an M60 machine gun, or anything else deemed to be made purposely for warfare.

As for ”regulatory policy to increase inflation”, you show your ignorance on the subject. The rest of your diatribe is likewise and reads like the failed manifesto of a madman.
Click to expand...

Assault rifle? I don't even own one but it is not the AR-15 that is the problem. It is the person that is the problem. Psychos will just use a different weapon. Clearly these are all difficult issues but I understand both side of the argument. I'm always reluctant to get the government more authority.

Official policy is we don't have an open border but you can't look at the southern border and the rhetoric from this WH and think they have anything other than an open border policy including the 10's of thousands unvetted Afghans they allowed in.

Tougher regulatory policy has contributed to the oil industry not investing in R&D and the equipment to pump and refine more oil. This adminstration has repeatedly said as much outloud they are trying to undermine the industry.

What your reply really demonstrates is your remedial grasp of the issues. You felt like it was a strong retort though. Everyday Biden voters prove why they are Biden voters. Are you one that thinks he's doing a good job?

 
  • Like
Reactions: 82_VOL_83
#196
#196
Rooster1 said:
Have you been to a gun show? It absolutely is true. “Gun shows” are a legal loophole for the purchase of firearms without background checks. It has been an issue debated for a long while.
Click to expand...

I'll ask a very simple question and hope it will elicit a very simple answer.

In what way are firearms laws in any way different standing outside a gun show than inside a gun show? Please explain the mechanism where a sale that would be illegal anywhere else becomes legal merely by stepping through the door to a show.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MemphisVol77 and LouderVol
#199
#199
hog88 said:
You might want to tell these guys.

Military vehicles for sale | EXARMYVEHICLES.com
Click to expand...
Again:

Before obtaining a destructive device, the buyer needs an FEP. The permit is issued by the FFLC, which is a department of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF). The permits are primarily used for the sale of large fireworks for individuals that plan on using the fireworks for a public display. Civilians are unlikely to obtain an FEP for an operational cannon or machine gun without demonstrating a specific use, such as a controlled historical reenactment or research.
Federal explosives licenses (FELs) are typically only issued to manufacturers, importers, and dealers to facilitate the sale of operational tanks.”
 
#200
#200
Rooster1 said:
Again:

Before obtaining a destructive device, the buyer needs an FEP. The permit is issued by the FFLC, which is a department of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF). The permits are primarily used for the sale of large fireworks for individuals that plan on using the fireworks for a public display. Civilians are unlikely to obtain an FEP for an operational cannon or machine gun without demonstrating a specific use, such as a controlled historical reenactment or research.
Federal explosives licenses (FELs) are typically only issued to manufacturers, importers, and dealers to facilitate the sale of operational tanks.”
Click to expand...


Want to buy a cannon? First, fill out some forms and pay $200

It may not be widely known, but most ordinary American citizens can own a cannon -- or a tank equipped with a cannon.
Click to expand...
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top