UTgrad2015
Super Duper Well-Known Member
- Joined
- May 25, 2019
- Messages
- 2,009
- Likes
- 9,069
With the win against Bama yesterday, I think an argument could be made for Heupel being our best coach since Fulmer. However, Butch won all 3 bowl games, while Heupel is 0-1. Butch also had back to back 9 win seasons and beat Georgia, which Heupel hasn’t done. However, Butch never beat Alabama, so I’d say those two things cancel each other out. Also, both beat Florida. What do you guys think? Has Josh surpassed Butch yet, or does he need more time?
They aren't tied. That's silly. I love CJH and he certainly could surpass Fulmer. But he needs a natty and a few sec championships before he can even be consideredThis is a silly comparison. Every human being with a pulse and even the most basic understanding of football and/or leadership can see Josh is already outperforming the best of Butch's years. And Butch is by far the best of the four knuckleheads between Fulmer and Heup (for Tennessee...I know, I know, Kiffin is better in other places. Let's keep him there).
Now, the more interesting question is, when does Heupel surpass Fulmer as the second-best coach in Vols history? I firmly believe it's going to happen. And could be fairly soon.
The argument for Philip: 152-52 (.745 win rate) ... six SEC East titles, two SEC championships, and one national crown.
To match that, I don't think Heup needs necessarily to wait 14-16 seasons to amass 200 games' worth of statistics. I don't even think he needs to get six seasons of SEC East dominance behind him.
I think once he wins the SEC twice and a national championship, he's on par with Fulmer. Any hardware he brings home after that point, I think he surpasses Phillip.
The amazing thing about that is, he could theoretically achieve that in the next 15 months. Amazing start for the hot young head coach.
Go Vols!
EDIT: oh wow, I just noticed something.
Fulmer in his lifetime was 152-52. That is a .745 win rate.
Heupel in his lifetime is 41-14. That is a .745 win rate.
Right now, right this minute, as we sit here, the two are tied.
Next week, when we whup UT-Martin, Heupel surpasses Fulmer in win percentage. And hopefully never drops back down below him ever again. That will require us to beat UT-M, KY, and UGa all three....
Oh, and another benefit of that is that Georgia will NOT catch us in the Top 10 winningest programs all-time, and maybe never will (they were just 3 games behind us as the season started).
Go Vols!
Read it again, more carefully. Was clearly talking about one specific stat. And in that, they are tied.They aren't tied. That's silly. I love CJH and he certainly could surpass Fulmer. But he needs a natty and a few sec championships before he can even be considered
With the win against Bama yesterday, I think an argument could be made for Heupel being our best coach since Fulmer. However, Butch won all 3 bowl games, while Heupel is 0-1. Butch also had back to back 9 win seasons and beat Georgia, which Heupel hasn’t done. However, Butch never beat Alabama, so I’d say those two things cancel each other out. Also, both beat Florida. What do you guys think? Has Josh surpassed Butch yet, or does he need more time?
Imo He’s better than Fulmer more like the best coach since Majors don’t forget Fulmer took Majors program that was already a powerhouse with a great culture and just continued that. Heupel inherited a dumpster fire and has turned it around in less than 2 years much like Majors did when he came here from Pitt.
Imo He’s better than Fulmer more like the best coach since Majors don’t forget Fulmer took Majors program that was already a powerhouse with a great culture and just continued that. Heupel inherited a dumpster fire and has turned it around in less than 2 years much like Majors did when he came here from Pitt.
With the win against Bama yesterday, I think an argument could be made for Heupel being our best coach since Fulmer. However, Butch won all 3 bowl games, while Heupel is 0-1. Butch also had back to back 9 win seasons and beat Georgia, which Heupel hasn’t done. However, Butch never beat Alabama, so I’d say those two things cancel each other out. Also, both beat Florida. What do you guys think? Has Josh surpassed Butch yet, or does he need more time?
This is a silly comparison. Every human being with a pulse and even the most basic understanding of football and/or leadership can see Josh is already outperforming the best of Butch's years. And Butch is by far the best of the four knuckleheads between Fulmer and Heup (for Tennessee...I know, I know, Kiffin is better in other places. Let's keep him there).
Now, the more interesting question is, when does Heupel surpass Fulmer as the second-best coach in Vols history? I firmly believe it's going to happen. And could be fairly soon.
The argument for Philip: 152-52 (.745 win rate) ... six SEC East titles, two SEC championships, and one national crown.
To match that, I don't think Heup needs necessarily to wait 14-16 seasons to amass 200 games' worth of statistics. I don't even think he needs to get six seasons of SEC East dominance behind him.
I think once he wins the SEC twice and a national championship, he's on par with Fulmer. Any hardware he brings home after that point, I think he surpasses Phillip.
The amazing thing about that is, he could theoretically achieve that in the next 15 months. Amazing start for the hot young head coach.
Go Vols!
EDIT: oh wow, I just noticed something.
Fulmer as a head coach was 152-52. That is a .745 win rate.
Heupel as a head coach is 41-14. That is a .745 win rate.
Right now, right this minute, as we sit here, the two are tied.
Next week, when we whup UT-Martin, Heupel surpasses Fulmer in win percentage. And hopefully never drops back down below him ever again. That will require us to beat UT-M, KY, and UGa all three....
Oh, and another benefit of that is that Georgia would NOT catch us in the Top 10 of the all-time winningest programs this year, and maybe never will (they were just 3 games behind us as the season started).
Go Vols!
And yet, that is how it's done.Fulmer coached his entire career here. Using Heupel’s UCF record to compare the win % isn’t that fair. I get the point you’re making. Just sorta hard to use two seasons of UCF to compare to a record made up of all games coached at Tennessee.
And yet, that is how it's done.
When we judge head coaches' careers in America today, we look at the totality of their careers. Fulmer's just happens to all have been at one school.
You’re absolutely correct. On paper we shouldn’t even be able to stay on the field with Bama. On paper we should’ve been beaten by LSU and Florida too. Coming into the year we had some people predicting 6-6 and 7-5 because of the roster. Now look. 10 wins is pretty much a lock, 11 wins is realistic and 12 is very possible. Vegas had us at what, I think it was about 7.5? Our coaching staff is proving that those recruiting rankings aren’t everything. They matter of course but they aren’t the whole story.
And yet, that is how it's done.
When we judge head coaches' careers in America today, we look at the totality of their careers..
Is this a serious question…?With the win against Bama yesterday, I think an argument could be made for Heupel being our best coach since Fulmer. However, Butch won all 3 bowl games, while Heupel is 0-1. Butch also had back to back 9 win seasons and beat Georgia, which Heupel hasn’t done. However, Butch never beat Alabama, so I’d say those two things cancel each other out. Also, both beat Florida. What do you guys think? Has Josh surpassed Butch yet, or does he need more time?
Fulmer coached his entire career here. Using Heupel’s UCF record to compare the win % isn’t that fair. I get the point you’re making. Just sorta hard to use two seasons of UCF to compare to a record made up of all games coached at Tennessee.
Fulmer is better than Majors. It's not even close. Tell again, how many championships did Majors win at UT? Majors rushed back and destroyed the 92 season. He should've been gone sooner. Fulmer was kept too long as well. But Fulmer is the better of the 2... You Majors guys are funny. Majors playbook was run, run, pass, punt....or Dickey or Majors and soon to be Heupel. He inherited (or stole) a very good team and eventually twice ran it into the ground.
Fulmer is better than Majors. It's not even close. Tell again, how many championships did Majors win at UT? Majors rushed back and destroyed the 92 season. He should've been gone sooner. Fulmer was kept too long as well. But Fulmer is the better of the 2... You Majors guys are funny. Majors playbook was run, run, pass, punt.