eVOLve
🟠Put on more steam!
- Joined
- Oct 13, 2011
- Messages
- 6,457
- Likes
- 17,053
there were definitely some "made for TV" moments. the scene with Dany walking down the stairs and Drogon spread his wings...visually, pretty cool. also kinda corny.So my biggest let down of last night was the writers not asking the most important question "why?"
Why did the dragon melt the throne? The only good answer is because Bran's in a wheelchair and he won't be able to sit on it...but that's also a really dumb reason for the dragon to melt the throne.
I honestly think that was pointless, I get Drogon showing up and being upset...have him belch some fire in the air and still take Dany off. Just think the throne being burnt was a pointless addition that the writer's overthought would be foreshadowing and "poetic"
another big gap....he's conspicuously absent...makes a surprise appearance at winterfel, then is on the small council.I'm wondering why Bronn was even in this season at all. Was he contractually obligated and the writers had no idea what to do with him?
More sensible in that it made sense in Brans character. It doesnt. He dismisses the politics and takes on a higher being who is not interested or destined to be involved in ruling. Then all of a sudden that's changed. There was zero suggestion that he was remotely interested in potentially ruling and becoming a king even if it was to make the world a better place or to station himself in a spot to save man from a future threat.sensible as defined by what we knew about westeros before Dany, or after?
ultimately, she accomplished her goal of breaking the wheel. it doesn't get any more broke than Bran the Broken..................elected by the leftover lords of westeros...........it's just not what so many had built up in their minds to be.....people have it in their heads who deserved what.....and that's not how anything worked in this story. it was the exception, not the rule, that people got what they deserved....
i'm not really disagreeing with you. he makes the least amount of sense for a lot of reasons. but from a story standpoint of "breaking the wheel", i get it. you have basically none of the leaders of the houses we've gotten to know over 8 seasons left to make any decisiosns. some "new" houses have been formed or pushed in to positions of leadership............and they did the most "non GOT" thing ever by electing a king.More sensible in that it made sense in Brans character. It doesnt. He dismisses the politics and takes on a higher being who is not interested or destined to be involved in ruling. Then all of a sudden that's changed. There was zero suggestion that he was remotely interested in potentially ruling and becoming a king even if it was to make the world a better place or to station himself in a spot to save man from a future threat.
If there was a new night king, then hed still have that macro purpose but now, in the grand scheme of things, it's back to micro.
another big gap....he's conspicuously absent...makes a surprise appearance at winterfel, then is on the small council.
agree with the other poster about the obligation for lannisters to always pay their debts.....but there's another little story that could have used a little more to it. i mean, where the heck was Bronn, and how did he arrive at KL?
anywho............
that's probably the case. still just found it odd, and it's something they could have done something with, with more time.I'm sticking with my theory. He was contractually obligated to be in Season 8 and they didn't know what to do with him.
Of course, that could be said about a lot of characters this season...
that's probably the case. still just found it odd, and it's something they could have done something with, with more time.
it is what it is. it didn't need a whole episode or anything lol. but he was a good character....
i think the biggest sin they committed for this season was cramming it in to 6 shows.
i felt that way as Tyrain was just walking around KL in the same spot we already saw last week with Ayra.I think there was a lot of time wasted in the Episodes they had. Not specifically 3 or 5, but the others had too many "filler" moments.
we kinda talked about that last week. Jon, as he watched what Dany was doing pretty much lost faith in all of it. and no way he would be king at that point....would be easy to see him head North and not look back, assuming at the time that he lived while taking out Dany.....there were only two ways for Jon to go out at that point, imo, he dies or he leaves it all behind. now some of the choice was taken away from him by being forced to take the black, but i don't know that he'd of stuck around if it was up to him anyway.
i was a little surprised at how steadfast they made him in his loyalty to Dany this episode, but i think it was pretty obvious he was in a state of denial.....Good thing Tyrian and him had that talk probably.
One of the articles I read suggested he is so duty bound he felt it was his duty to stop Dany but realizes it makes him a traitor. His move beyond the Wall is his way of exiling himself to deal with his conscious. In his mind he's not welcome in the "realm" because of his crime.
the opposite of Jamie Lannister. and Jamie actually saved the millions of people. Jon just avenged them, begrudgenly.....sort of. so i can see that.One of the articles I read suggested he is so duty bound he felt it was his duty to stop Dany but realizes it makes him a traitor. His move beyond the Wall is his way of exiling himself to deal with his conscious. In his mind he's not welcome in the "realm" because of his crime.