Well, technically, she is remaining anonymous in that her name isn't being published alongside her claims. However, because she has identified herself as being the mother of one of his 4 kids, her identity is accessible with very little effort, to anyone who wants to know who she is. This will make Herschel look like an a$$, if he continues to insist that he doesn't know who is making these abortion claims.
At this point, the accuser has made enough identifiable information public, that Herschel knows damn well which woman is claiming that he paid for her abortion. His defense will have to adjust. He can no longer say that he has no idea who she is. He can only say that it isn't true.Yet if the accuser is just making it up there is nothing to lose.
At this point, the accuser has made enough identifiable information public, that Herschel knows damn well which woman is claiming that he paid for her abortion. His defense will have to adjust. He can no longer say that he has no idea who she is. He can only say that it isn't true.
LOL.Regardless who cares?
LOL.
I believe that there are some independent/moderate voters in Georgia, who will care that a Pro-Life Senate candidate, who has described abortion as being "a woman killing her baby", paid for a mistress of his to have an abortion in 2009.
Your "who cares" card isn't accepted everywhere.
I'm not outraged. To the contrary, this latest development with Herschel Walker suits me just fine.Neither is your selective outrage.
I'm not outraged. To the contrary, this latest development with Herschel Walker suits me just fine.
Republicans are shooting themselves in the foot this election cycle. There is actually a chance for Democrats to retain control of the Senate. That was unthinkable 6 months ago.
Not really. Different people crying about the same things going on today. The Obama days were bad too, at least the latter ones here.Yeah, I guess so... but it was better than this 5 years ago.
I am not sure the polls are right anymore. The closer they get to election day the more they tighten . I think that is so they don't have egg on their face. I think a lot of people will be disappointed by their accuracy again. I have also read articles that many people are reluctant to participate and the polls represent people with predetermined voting preferences . We'll see.Don't think R's pick up the Senate.
If they do...watch out..gonna be nasty.
It's the exact same issue with Walker. If people didnt support him it wouldnt be a problem. I have no idea why the voters are willing to accept external explanations for what is clearly an internal problem.Not with voters like you out there, it's the reason the good reverend was elected in the first place
Oh good, you’re back. I’m ready to get all these windows closed.I don't think the Rs will get the Senate either and that's probably a good thing.
Oh good, you’re back. I’m ready to get all these windows closed.
Here’s another one from MotherJones lamenting the asymmetry of the character issue.
McCain’s Character
Here’s one from David Brooks citing McCain’s character.I see that you spent your evening being productive. It only took you all night to come up with a couple op-eds that you said were easy to google.
Here’s one from David Brooks citing McCain’s character.
https://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/26/opinion/26brooks.html
Imagine if you hadn’t acted like a bitch to try to avoid looking like a dunce for a week.Just imagine if you would have posted one of these yesterday, how much time and effort would have been saved.