You are leaving out a significant component of this story, when you don't mention Herschel's holier-than-thou public stance against abortion without exception. God told him "Thou shalt not kill," and abortion was a woman killing her baby, remember?Just as odd as the ones that call him immoral now for paying for an abortion.
You seem to contradict yourself. They had a record turnout because it wasn't about ideology. The extra was about who Trump is, not his policies or party. You think 81m showed up because of ideology?
So what he wanted her to take a deferment on the baby? Like going to college? Just put it off for another year? I don’t think the science exists for that, yet.Him saying it isn't convenient isn't him asking for an abortion....ultimately it was her choice right....whether he supported it or not is moot...he stepped up an responsibly paid...and my understanding is that he supported all his children....is that not correct?
... and then spear-headed a weak law suit against the NFL, which only netted the USFL a $1.00 reward, and then pushed the league into trying to compete with the NFL head to head in the fall. Effectively, running the USFL into the ground.Remember that time Donald Trump owned a professional football team with two Heismans in the back field.
Flutie and Walker.............
You seem to contradict yourself. They had a record turnout because it wasn't about ideology. The extra was about who Trump is, not his policies or party. You think 81m showed up because of ideology?
This is easy for you to say. You don’t have much of a problem with abortion. For these people who shriek about baby murder it’s part of their political and religious identity.Lol at the dim's creating a reason to not support Herschel thread is like saying reason to support Warnock.
There's the rub. A Democrat won't agree with you, when you say that Biden's character is worse than Trump's.
Well each personality has a different opinion and memoryA crack in the dam, maybe?
Herschel Walker now says that he didn't pay for an abortion ... but there would be nothing wrong with it if he had.
Seriously, Herschel?
He called abortion, "a woman killing her baby," but then says that there would be nothing wrong with paying for an abortion? Damn, this guy is all over the road.
No, dude. “It’s not a convenient time for me to have a child” is a euphemism for “I’d prefer that you have an abortion.” There’s no pause button, there no rewind. You abort or you carry to term. Obviously she can make a different decision, but the whole “maybe he regretted it” is out the window if you assume that’s true.Did he say he wanted the abortion performed? Or did he say the timing was bad and she decided...and he paid?
If thats the case why would they be together in the 1st place...abortion is not a mistake eraser..
Noone is disputing if medical issues as a legit reason, or rape, or incest
.which make up only 5% of abortions
...but abortion is used now as forM of birth control for many..thats the issue
If that is truly whay he meant then yes it's out the window..as yes HW is a hypocritical POS..and if there was a better candidate then shame on GA GOP voter..but he is still a better choice then warnock..I have dealt with a friend and an abortion...having the baby would have killed her...and it was the hardest choice she ever made...I even offered to say it was mine if she choose to try...she was the 5%....ans she still regrets it to this day....if HW said he did this woukd go away..but he wontNo, dude. “It’s not a convenient time for me to have a child” is a euphemism for “I’d prefer that you have an abortion.” There’s no pause button, there no rewind. You abort or you carry to term. Obviously she can make a different decision, but the whole “maybe he regretted it” is out the window if you assume that’s true.
It’s not that big of a deal. When the rubber met the road, it turned out you didn’t really believe this stuff. Or at least you think momentary Republican control of the senate is more important.
There’s not really any shame in that. You guys are just coming around to where Democrats were on abortion before twitter drove them off the deep end, that it’s fine for people to choose to have an abortion for any reason up to a certain point of gestation. As long as you’re comfortable with that position, there’s no need for all the mental gymnastics.
So for the "abortion is murder" crowd, if HW had paid a hitman to kill his wife, would you still vote for him? You have to treat the two as equivalent if you really believe abortion is murder and he paid for the abortion.
If I had to guess they merely see him as a pawn in the fight to establish their Christian caliphate or whatever their agenda is. Same with Trump. Even though they’re reprehensible people, their voters aren’t bothered by it. They’ve been "chosen" to do the Lord’s work, and the Lord can work through anybody.
Idk at some point hypocrisy is hard to explain away.
So whatSo for the "abortion is murder" crowd, if HW had paid a hitman to kill his wife, would you still vote for him? You have to treat the two as equivalent if you really believe abortion is murder and he paid for the abortion.
So what
Warnock votes for our tax dollars to perform millions of abortions worldwide, those good folks down in GA gonna stop the bleeding
That's the whole idea, make them rare and the exception. Continuing to murder is the only idiocracy associated with this subject.