Holy Trinity Discussion

#376
#376
Behr said:
Oh wow I never thought of that. Lulz. Pretty sure you already know what I think. My only point was during the copy and paste a word got added.
Click to expand...
Nope.
It’s on the app but not on 1995 or 1997.
It is still separate on the footnote for 1995 and 1997 so…..
Whatever….I guess

I agree most already know what they think before they study
 
#379
#379
Orangeslice13 said:
Nope to what you said.
That’s what “nope” means
Click to expand...
Okay dude.

I followed the footnote and it was from Biblegateway. The verse from the NASB right above the footnote did not have the extra Our in it. That second our changes the meaning of the verse in my opinion so I pointed it out.

You said Nope. Unless you copied and pasted that verse from somewhere else, it's not there.
 
#380
#380
Behr said:
Okay dude.

I followed the footnote and it was from Biblegateway. The verse from the NASB right above the footnote did not have the extra Our in it. That second our changes the meaning of the verse in my opinion so I pointed it out.

You said Nope. Unless you copied and pasted that verse from somewhere else, it's not there.
Click to expand...
Sure it is.
I copied and pasted it.
 
#392
#392
Orangeslice13 said:
That particular footnote says the version I posted is an acceptable version.

That’s kinda why I included it.
Click to expand...
Okay this is ridiculous.

That footenote is saying what the NASB is saying is acceptable but that's not what you posted. And the footnote is saying what the NSAB is saying OR "the great God and our Savior" .. is also acceptable. I mentioned that last night because that's what the KJV says and I know how you feel about it.

Here's what you posted.

Screenshot_20250114_195837_Chrome.jpg

Here's what you said you copied and pasted.

Screenshot_20250114_195915_Chrome.jpg
 
#394
#394
Behr said:
I understood it perfectly the last time we discussed this and the pork. And Hell. Not sure why you act like you don't remember.
Click to expand...
because you didn’t answer then. You won’t answer now and you don’t see what you’re missing.
 
#398
#398
Behr said:
Yes I did. All my answers that you didn't like are in those threads that you got deleted.
Click to expand...
You have not answered anything.
And you never will because you might have to think outside your spoon fed dogma.

There was never anyone named Jesus. But there was a Yeshua who was the only begotten of the almighty G-d and he said that the law is the definition of sin and would remain that way until heaven and earth pass away.

Do you agree with him?
 
#399
#399
Orangeslice13 said:
You have not answered anything.
And you never will because you might have to think outside your spoon fed dogma.

There was never anyone named Jesus. But there was a Yeshua who was the only begotten of the almighty G-d and he said that the law is the definition of sin and would remain that way until heaven and earth pass away.

Do you agree with him?
Click to expand...
Explain to me why the Apocalypse of Peter should replace the chit book Hebrews.

Or tell me why you change words in scripture. That's a no no.
 
#400
#400
Orangeslice13 said:
You have not answered anything.
And you never will because you might have to think outside your spoon fed dogma.

There was never anyone named Jesus. But there was a Yeshua who was the only begotten of the almighty G-d and he said that the law is the definition of sin and would remain that way until heaven and earth pass away.

Do you agree with him?
Click to expand...
I'm not answering anymore of your questions because I've already answered them. Go ahead do your thing. I wasnt playing a game, i was just pointing out a mistake and here we are.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top