ruger1234
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Nov 16, 2014
- Messages
- 1,129
- Likes
- 1,398
Explain how climate change caused the storm to stall?
Link didn't answer my question.
From the article
"All of this said, a storm like Harvey could have happened even if there was no climate change."
Harvey benefitted from unusually toasty waters in the Gulf of Mexico. As the storm roared toward Houston last week, sea-surface waters near Texas rose to between 2.7 and 7.2 degrees Fahrenheit above average. These waters were some of the hottest spots of ocean surface in the world. The tropical storm, feeding off this unusual warmth, was able to progress from a tropical depression to a category-four hurricane in roughly 48 hours."
Read the entire article. It also said 30 percent of the intensity of this event can be attributed to human activity.
This is a big picture issue, not a political issue. On such matters, I choose to side with the 99 percent scientific community. If you don't, I hope you are not making decisions in any relevant endeavor in this world.
"Harvey benefitted from unusually toasty waters in the Gulf of Mexico. As the storm roared toward Houston last week, sea-surface waters near Texas rose to between 2.7 and 7.2 degrees Fahrenheit above average. These waters were some of the hottest spots of ocean surface in the world. The tropical storm, feeding off this unusual warmth, was able to progress from a tropical depression to a category-four hurricane in roughly 48 hours."
Read the entire article. It also said 30 percent of the intensity of this event can be attributed to human activity.
This is a big picture issue, not a political issue. On such matters, I choose to side with the 99 percent scientific community. If you don't, I hope you are not making decisions in any relevant endeavor in this world.
"Harvey benefitted from unusually toasty waters in the Gulf of Mexico. As the storm roared toward Houston last week, sea-surface waters near Texas rose to between 2.7 and 7.2 degrees Fahrenheit above average. These waters were some of the hottest spots of ocean surface in the world. The tropical storm, feeding off this unusual warmth, was able to progress from a tropical depression to a category-four hurricane in roughly 48 hours."
Read the entire article. It also said 30 percent of the intensity of this event can be attributed to human activity.
This is a big picture issue, not a political issue. On such matters, I choose to side with the 99 percent scientific community. If you don't, I hope you are not making decisions in any relevant endeavor in this world.
Harvey’s unusual trajectory (or lack thereof) stems from the fact that it’s stuck between two areas of strong upper-level high pressure, one in the western US, and another centered around the southeast. “Hurricanes effectively move as pebbles in a stream, that is, they are steered by large-scale weather patterns,” Klotzbach said. “The combination of these high pressure areas means that the storm is currently stationary.”
This event is historical and unprecedented. It is, my climate change naysayers, what 99 percent of the climatologists have been warning us about for years. And it will only get worse in future years.
"All of this said, a storm like Harvey could have happened even if there was no climate change."
This single sentence from the article you provided nullifies your point.
The strength of the storm was not what caused the devastating flooding. It stalled moving between one and two miles per hour close enough to the gulf to have an endless supply of moisture. Again, how did climate change cause the storm to stall?
I'm not a climatologist and you aren't either. You stick with your 1 percent and I'll stick with my 99 percent. Our grandchildren and great grandchildren are the ones who will get to make the call on this one. :hi:
This pic....
Wtf
[twitter]https://twitter.com/dividendsmgr/status/901814414151692289[/twitter]