Amazing how people form these stories in their own heads. Alexis was play fighting with his girlfriend and it got out of hand. If he did a fraction of what he was accused of, he would have received more than a judicial diversion. Which by the way means he didn't plead guilty to anything. I also noticed someone mentioned the lawsuit. For one, it has been settled. So I doubt much could come of Alexis being reinstated since his girlfriend, who dropped the charges, received money from the lawsuit. To be honest, it's bogus that Alexis was involved in the lawsuit to begin with seeing as though the supposed reason behind the lawsuit was due to lax punishment of the players. He was suspended immediately and added to the lawsuit 2 days later. I think you set a bad precedent when you remove a kid's due process and assign guilt before all of the facts are in. Another reason the federal government should butt out state funded universities. These are legal matters that should be handled by the authorities not the schools.
Didn't the legal authorities put him on 6 month probation? Should one on/during probation be receiving all of the same benefits as those around him/her not on probation? Maybe his being reinstated only after probation will help other students think before they play fight. Maybe he'll be all-cleared and playing Aug 1.