thagodfather
baseball juggernaut
- Joined
- Dec 23, 2006
- Messages
- 3,654
- Likes
- 5
You keep making excuses. I'll keep telling the truth. I fine with that.
Yeah sure, and Jamal Lewis wasn't good at pass blockeing, therefore he didn't play until after the FL game his freshman year. That was a great move by Fulmer wasn't it.
Botton line, Stokes is better, by far, than any other post player we have (Maymon is good too) and should be playing 25-30 minutes/game. Hall and Woolridge should come in ONLY when he needs a breather.
And you really think that's what cost us this game.
We lost this game in the first half giving up easy baskets on transition.
Our guards were loafing down the floor. We gave up at least 10 points there.
And we don't have a guard that can handle the ball without turning it over or make a pass to the right color shirt.
Your lazy guards cost us this game.
Yeah sure, and Jamal Lewis wasn't good at pass blockeing, therefore he didn't play until after the FL game his freshman year. That was a great move by Fulmer wasn't it.
Botton line, Stokes is better, by far, than any other post player we have (Maymon is good too) and should be playing 25-30 minutes/game. Hall and Woolridge should come in ONLY when he needs a breather.
Well, considering he is not yet in game shape, he would need a breather quite often. He is not ready for 25-30 minutes a game. Believe it or not, Martin knows more than you do.
Sure I do. A coach's responsibility is to put the BEST players on the floor that give him a chance to win. If you can honestly tell me Stokes isn't one of the best 5 players on the team, then I'll agree with you. Otherwise, he should've been playing in OT.
Your best players are not always your most talented players. Everyone here will agree that Stokes is the most talented player we have on the team. But, right now he is not the best choice to have out there in close situations. He still needs to learn the defense and offense, he still needs to get into game shape.
It is not making excuses, this team is not very good offensively, and these same guys wouldn't be playing defense under our last coach, so at least they are doing what they can do...Check our last few years..If we were playing like we did in the past, we wouldn't have these heart wrenching losses, we would be blown out every game..This team has heart, just not much ability..
Stokes - 2 games into college career
Hall - Junior with atleast 30 college career games
I know who I would have in there at crunch time. Kenny knows the defense we are running, he played good D on his man. Jarnell is still new and still learning the defense.
Stokes 11 pts. and 8 Reb. ; Kenny Hall 4 points and 3 Reb.
Hmmmm.... I wonder who should get more PT?? Why did Kenny Hall play 4 1/2 mnutes of OT and Stokes only played 1/2 minute?
With TV timeouts and 10 team timeouts (combined), there is plenty of time for rest. He played 26 minutes tonight. He just needed to play 5 more (OT) and we win the game. Just my opinion....
You know why this team is not very good offensively? We recruited guys that didn't score in high school? We have offensive weapons. We just don't use them. We come out of timeouts lost on offense. And appear to be content with our point guard taking half court three pointers.
Your best players are not always your most talented players. Everyone here will agree that Stokes is the most talented player we have on the team. But, right now he is not the best choice to have out there in close situations. He still needs to learn the defense and offense, he still needs to get into game shape.
Yeah sure, and Jamal Lewis wasn't good at pass blockeing, therefore he didn't play until after the FL game his freshman year. That was a great move by Fulmer wasn't it.
Botton line, Stokes is better, by far, than any other post player we have (Maymon is good too) and should be playing 25-30 minutes/game. Hall and Woolridge should come in ONLY when he needs a breather.
Respectfully disagree tonight. Hall was awful and Stokes was on in the 2nd half. We have a losing record, so it's not like it's a big risk. Hall being in the game down the stretch, with all of his experience, has led to losses and errors.
Respectfully disagree tonight. Hall was awful and Stokes was on in the 2nd half. We have a losing record, so it's not like it's a big risk. Hall being in the game down the stretch, with all of his experience, has led to losses and errors.
I think after tonight, with a few more practices, Jarnell has to play down the stretch late.
I would have prefer Jarnell down the stretch. But I can see it go either way.
Stokes-showed more skill, better feel and better hands in his first 5 minutes of his college career than Hall will show in his entire career.
You have a losing record by playing Hall down the stretch this year, and have a hoss that had a good 2nd half. Regarding D, Hall didn't box on a ft when we were still in the game, didn't chase down a ball in the corner, and didn't get to the baseline to cut off the driver any quicker than Stokes.
Tonight, it should have been a no brainer to start Stokes in OT.