DC_Vol
Bush league poster
- Joined
- Sep 13, 2008
- Messages
- 21,536
- Likes
- 39,649
I would rather give these Mother’s pamphlets on safe sex so they can understand what causes babies and what to do to prevent them.Why would they need to be "taken in"? It appears most of them have jobs. What you might do instead is adopt some unwanted children of mothers who no longer have access to abortions.
You should have a beer while you wait. It will mellow you out. If she still isn't ready, have another and you won't care and she will have to drive.Sounds awesome as I wait on a slow azz woman to get here so that I can go out to eat and have a beer.
Environmental impact study? Lol gtfoIt is not proven that it will work. I don't think the environmental impact has been studied carefully. It's been established that most of the drugs are not entering the country via border jumpers. Mexico is possibly ready to lend a hand. Mexico isn't going to pay as we were promised so the burden is on the taxpayers. When people think of America they think of Stars and Stripes, the Statue of Liberty, and the Constitution. I don't like the image of a barrier between nations to come to mind.
It is not proven that it will work. I don't think the environmental impact has been studied carefully. It's been established that most of the drugs are not entering the country via border jumpers. Mexico is possibly ready to lend a hand. Mexico isn't going to pay as we were promised so the burden is on the taxpayers. When people think of America they think of Stars and Stripes, the Statue of Liberty, and the Constitution. I don't like the image of a barrier between nations to come to mind.
Can you link to that? The studies I've seen have actually indicated the opposite--that most of the drugs confiscated have been at ports, but that the VAST majority of drug in the US are from South and Central America.
Their argument is that virtually all drugs are coming through legal entry points and are being detected. The problem with the claim is that who knows what is coming across elsewhere. The judgement is all about what is caught and assuming that customs catches almost everything coming through checkpoints while completely ignoring the probability that drugs are entering at non checkpoints. They've got the number on what is stopped, but they don't have the total on drugs crossing, and they don't have either what is missed at checkpoints or what is going completely around checkpoints. So they have one of three important numbers ... a classic case of you don't know what you don't know.
Common sense tells you that if customs is really that efficient at the checkpoints, it makes sense to bypass the checkpoints. I'm getting the impression that drug lords are a lot smarter than the people making up statistics.
Well, duh.
That's why I asked.
Well, duh.
That's why I asked.
Had to google lupara... always learn something on VN. Reminds me of when I was a kid of 5 or 6 with several siblings and a bleak Christmas in prospect till my Sicilian Uncle Joe in NJ sent a truckload of toys our way. Years later come to find out he got the money from borrowing his sister’s car and selling it. He was also disbarred for some kind of immigration related shenanigans which nowadays would probably earn a Congressional commendation.The Sicilian variety? Particularly the ones who let a lupara speak for them?