Blame who you want: but refusing to allow a person use their own name, their own image or their own likeness to make money but allow other to make literally billions is un-American af. The USSC putting an end to the practice was the right thing to do.
With regard to the portal: Force the coaches to sit a year when they leave or pay a year of their next salary to the NCAA and put an end to the portal and I would be good with it. However, allowing coaches to pack up and leave in the dead of night with out penalty while forcing an athlete to sit a year or more = wrong. As long as coaches can leave with out penalty then so should student athletes.
If you or I had been D1 athletes in today's world, our parents and ourselves would most likely be taking advantage of the situation also.
The thing that bothers me about takes like yours; you are so willing to deny a basic right to some one so you can be entertained at a higher level. That is an amazing and sad mind-set IMO.
Why on Earth would we want to cap how much a person can earn on their name, image, and likeness? It's border line evil to want to do so. Most certainly selfish by those who want to limit it.
I appreciate that point of view and you have a point. I wouldn't argue the players don't have a right to NIL income. I'm just saying that it's going to change what I, personally, enjoyed about college football.
But maybe my view is just antiquated. And as I said at the beginning maybe I and others in my age range overly romanticized it from the getgo.
Yes they still get a scholarship as NIL money has nothing to do with the University.I know this is probably a dumb question, but does any NIL money have to go toward tuition/books etc? Are kids getting free-ride scholarships AND NIL money?
I haven't talked to a single person who thinks the NIL thing is a good idea.
No. You're just selfish. Don't believe in individual liberty completely. Makes you throw a temper tantrum. You do the same thing about individual liberties in the politics forumI appreciate that point of view and you have a point. I wouldn't argue the players don't have a right to NIL income. I'm just saying that it's going to change what I, personally, enjoyed about college football.
But maybe my view is just antiquated. And as I said at the beginning maybe I and others in my age range overly romanticized it from the getgo.
Sounds kinda salty over your top QB recruit dumping you.....It's a business now and nothing more.There will be no such thing as loyalty to a program, school, or coach. The best players will force universities into bidding wars. A QB that wins the Heisman as a junior? He'll put himself on the free agency list for the portal the day after the bowls are done. Gone will be the days of sitting in the stands and watching a player progress over 2 to 4 years, maybe 5.
I'm not naive, I know it happened before on a lesser scale when it was not legal to make offers like we see now. But the scope of it now, and the fact that its going to just get worse....
There is no solution. NIL cannot be capped. I don't know, maybe student athletes never really did have much loyalty or allegiance and we romanticized it off the strength of the very few that seemed to embrace it, Peyton Manning, Tim Tebow. But now school fan bases are going to needle each other about how they stole this player or that player.
Time to realize that it was really just all about the show in years past? TV rights, pageantry, fight songs. The whole thing is just so depressing.
I appreciate that point of view and you have a point. I wouldn't argue the players don't have a right to NIL income. I'm just saying that it's going to change what I, personally, enjoyed about college football.
But maybe my view is just antiquated. And as I said at the beginning maybe I and others in my age range overly romanticized it from the getgo.
I’m right there with you…..100%. It’s sad for people like us…..the end of an era. I knew it was coming, but not this fast.I appreciate that point of view and you have a point. I wouldn't argue the players don't have a right to NIL income. I'm just saying that it's going to change what I, personally, enjoyed about college football.
But maybe my view is just antiquated. And as I said at the beginning maybe I and others in my age range overly romanticized it from the getgo.
It shouldn't be sad. You should be happy a massive wrong had been fixed. Why the hell would you be ok with someone not being able to earn off their Name, Image, and Likeness? It's evil.I’m right there with you…..100%. It’s sad for people like us…..the end of an era. I knew it was coming, but not this fast.
That's my position exactly. I don't see why you wouldn't want to see your guys to do well for themselves.I enjoy watching players in Tennessee uniforms playing the game. Some were Tennessee fans from birth. Most were not, they only came here because they felt we offered them the best opportunity. I can't see how someone still doing that, but making money for it, would change how I feel about watching them play football.
You are terribly, massively, and ignorantly confused. The university isn't paying anything regarding NIL. Please educate yourself.I didn't read all the pages, but the OP and some others have some solid opinions. I don't care for the NIL for many reasons, but it has been in play for years, just under the table. As a friend from Ghana told me. "The US is crazy. It is upside-down. You pay for the feet, not for the head". The NIL is one example of the US value pyramid. So the fans enable the university to pay them a large bounty to play a game and the spiral begins.
We have already seen just a small taste of that aspect of NIL. Wait until agents start getting involved, and don't think it won't happen.I wish they all could make bank on it. That's my only problem. You're gonna have guys that make millions , while the guy blocking for him is scraping by and it's going to become a locker room cancer that stops all the hard work and progress in it's tracks. I'd love to believe it won't , but it will. Doesn't matter. That cork was popped and tossed into the river.
Really? Who adopted that? Not sure it will stand up to legal scrutiny but interesting if true.