I don't understand your first comment - are you saying his policies were good then but not now?
I'm glad you brought up the idea of being open-minded. Have you been open minded at all about Obama? Sure sounds like you had your mind made up the second you heard he was running for POTUS.
I'm glad you brought up the idea of being open-minded. Have you been open minded at all about Obama? Sure sounds like you had your mind made up the second you heard he was running for POTUS.
I was saying his candidacy was much more appealing then than now. I voted for him in the GOP primary 8 years ago.
He was more believable then. He was the maverick then. He was willing to give the finger to the right-wing wackos. Now he's on his knees every chance he gets. He let Rove and his hacks destroy his reputation in SCarolina, then came back and stumped for the man Rove put in the White House for two terms. For all the talk about Obama doing whatever is necessary to become president, I don't hear a lot of the same treatment for McCain from many posters on this board.
And getting out of this war happens to be a pretty big issue, and McCain doesn't seem to care if we're there well beyond his remaining years in this life.
I can understand your reasoning for voting for McCain. But given what he's done in recent years, and given who he's running against now, and given the challenges we face now, that doesn't do it for me.
Why would I list it as a reason to vote or not to vote for someone based on tax cuts that I won't see in either case?
1)If you believe McCain is on his knees to right wing wackos, you then have to believe Obama is likewise on his knees to the left. Both are doing what they see as necessary to get elected. I hardly see an advantage to Obama in this regard.
I would suggest also that you are misstating his position on Iraq. I'm quite sure he does care and sees his view as the best solution as Obama does his.
I was open-minded since I knew he would be running the second he spoke at the DNC (great speech).
How'd you know then? He didn't announce until years after that.
I understand he's been knocked from the pedestal, and I understand I'm taking a bit of a risk trying to help him get elected, but it's a calculated risk -- I still think he can lead this country to do great things. If he turned out to be the failure as president many on here predict he would be (and for the record, raising taxes on the highest income earners alone won't qualify as failure IMO), then I will take some responsibility for supporting him.
How'd you know then? He didn't announce until years after that.
I understand he's been knocked from the pedestal, and I understand I'm taking a bit of a risk trying to help him get elected, but it's a calculated risk -- I still think he can lead this country to do great things. If he turned out to be the failure as president many on here predict he would be (and for the record, raising taxes on the highest income earners alone won't qualify as failure IMO), then I will take some responsibility for supporting him.
not saying I'm psychic but I thought it was a pretty obvious move at the time. Young, black man who is a very good speaker? It just seemed like his WH run was being put it motion that night.
We do have quite a few people that work non-traditional workweeks (Sat-Wed) and that seems to be an interesting idea too.
If you raise taxes on the wealthy at this point it will put us into a full blown recession, we are on the precipice right now. With oil and gas as it is just one nudge is all it would take. You have to be very careful with the moves you make right now. Lower taxes for all would do more good than raising taxes for a few just to satisfy your base. It's like cutting off your nose to spite your face.