VOL_Lyfe
Air Assault
- Joined
- Oct 15, 2012
- Messages
- 11,942
- Likes
- 15,643
I don't know if that's on the LG for chasing the stunt and whiffing on the blitzer, the RG for looking inside and turning the DE loose or JG or all 3, but it was craptastic. Worst part of that play was as soon as JG put his foot in the ground, he was about to throw it in rhythm to a wide open WR. Another half second and that's a completion.Actually the right guard turned the DE loose to pick up the MLB that didn't blitz. That left our RB on a DL and not a blitzing corner or LB.
The extra guy that come was the corner who really should have been Chandler's responsibility but he wasn't moved over by JG to pick him up. By the time the corner made it to the pocket the LG had already committed to a double with the center and didn't see the corner until he was through.
It was 2 bad mismatches that could have been avoided by Chandler being moved over to the proper side blocking a corner and the RG staying with his block. The safety alignment was a dead giveaway that the blitz was coming from that side.
The pass to Juwan Jennings would have been better if it had been thrown 8 to 12 in farther, or shorter to make it a true back shoulder pass.Those are called back shoulder throws, it puts the ball where only your guy can get it, and allows the reciever to turn his head at the last second and still make a play on the ball, they weren't short, they were exactly where his guys needed them to be.
The one to Palmer was a little different. Don't know if that was the plan or not, but I agree, you don't see that a lot between the numbers.Thanks. I know a back shoulder throw is normally thrown along the sideline and the team had been practicing them. Don’t usually notice that on deep throws down the middle.
To me.I don't know if that's on the LG for chasing the stunt and whiffing on the blitzer, the RG for looking inside and turning the DE loose or JG or all 3, but it was craptastic. Worst part of that play was as soon as JG put his foot in the ground, he was about to throw it in rhythm to a wide open WR. Another half second and that's a completion.
The maddening thing is that it wasn't even a hard blitz to protect. It was a 5 man pressure with a couple of loopers. Helton is getting criticized for playcalling, but what the heck do you call next when you can't do the simple stuff?To me.
You wouldn't want your RG turning a bigger DE/DT loose to pick up a smaller more athletic LB. While handing your RB a bigger DE/DT running down hill. Im assuming he knew he had help behind him or that really didn't make sense.
The back side has to be accounted for when JG is turning to his right which he did. That ball was never going to the left based off his set up and his help was set up to the right side which he could see.
Chandler should have been moved over to the blind side with the safety lined up where he was. At least then JG can see the guy that's not accounted for if he blitzs. The LB
Yep. Jennings was open on the slant, just need a fraction longer. What could have been a 10 yard gain turned into a 3 yard field for Bama. Gotta get rid of those plays.
Yeah. About the only thing the wasn't clear was whether the LB was coming, but at least he would have been in JGs eyeline.The maddening thing is that it wasn't even a hard blitz to protect. It was a 5 man pressure with a couple of loopers. Helton is getting criticized for playcalling, but what the heck do you call next when you can't do the simple stuff?
I think that LB kind of took the play off. He just stood there. Seems like he either needed to pressure or drop into that slant area where the ball was about to go.Yeah. About the only thing the wasn't clear was whether the LB was coming, but at least he would have been in JGs eyeline.
If everyone is lined up correctly that's a positive play. 1 missed alignment and you have people 2 people in bad spots.
I think JG has more upside and they the coaches was hoping he would start to get it. But I liked how KC looked when he came in he is definitely more experienced.JG does have a real big problem recognizing a blitz. JG has played/started like what...12 games give or take. He just doesnt have what it takes. The Auburn game was more on our receivers than anything. The article is spot on. KC should play from here on out.
How long should a QB be given to develop? Especially now a days when kids are coming straight out of high school and lighting it up. Not trying to dog JG just wondering.
Our O line has been 1 year away for a decade. They may be better next year but they won't be goodFans who’ve said the same things all year aren’t “haters”. I want to see JG play like he did against Auburn every game - and once he learns from film study and practice enough to overcome these mistakes, hopefully he will.
I’d like to see KC get the start against S.C. maybe he gets our offense going early and if not JG can come off the bench to provide a spark (would be a nice luxury to let him rest the injury a full week though)
Next year our Oline will be better (after a second year of actual S&C and a real OL coach instead of a ballet instructor). I think JG will benefit from actual coaching too and will come into his own next year with more games like he had against Auburn.
Sorry to start another quarterback thread, but I think his comments are worth reading.
More comments from Irwin below, if you're interested.
Irwin: Guarantano throws a prettier ball than Manning, but doesn’t have the intangibles
.
well, let's face it we do have a QB situation worth talking about...nothing wrong with that...yes, JG does throw a nice longer ball...yes, he does hold it a second too long...Keller throws a better short ball and gets rid of it faster...Manning had a better O-line to throw behind...short or long...
GO VOLS!
I agree.. He has the ability to stretch a defense. He just takes a lot of hits and the game seems to fast at times for him..It's a valid criticism of JG (unlike most of the ones we typically see here at VN). JG is still too slow to throw the ball sometimes and still struggles at times to read the defense. He's improved this season, though, and the flip-side is that he's absolutely one of the most accurate pure passers in all of college football.
Chryst and JG are pretty even overall IMO, with Chryst being better at reading defenses and JG being better at throwing very accurate deep passes. The problem with Chryst over JG isn't even really a problem with Chryst so much as it's a problem with our O-line.
Our O-line can not run block. We're averaging like 1-2 yards per carry right now against quality defenses. You can't win games like that.
JG gives us a better shot at winning precisely because what you saw against Auburn; he can throw the deep ball and spread the defense. With JG, it at least improves the odds for our run game. Against Chryst, it becomes easier for defenses to simply shut down the run. If we had Stanford's offensive line, it would be a different story, but we don't. Therefore, I think JG gives us a better shot at winning, and we saw that versus Auburn.
But it's absolutely true that JG needs to read defenses better to be elite. It's also true that he had crappy QB coaching for most of his early career here, so he might continue to improve rapidly.
Thank you!!!What is said here is the plain and simple answer that many of us have been trying to say for sometime. For us dumbas-es, "he just doesn't have football smarts." Being tough is not helping with what happens to him. If he knew the things Irwin speaks of, he wouldn't have to show how tough he is on every play. The ball would be out of his hands on a pass or to a back, not him trying to decide what to do until he gets hammered.
It's a valid criticism of JG (unlike most of the ones we typically see here at VN). JG is still too slow to throw the ball sometimes and still struggles at times to read the defense. He's improved this season, though, and the flip-side is that he's absolutely one of the most accurate pure passers in all of college football.
Chryst and JG are pretty even overall IMO, with Chryst being better at reading defenses and JG being better at throwing very accurate deep passes. The problem with Chryst over JG isn't even really a problem with Chryst so much as it's a problem with our O-line.
Our O-line can not run block. We're averaging like 1-2 yards per carry right now against quality defenses. You can't win games like that.
JG gives us a better shot at winning precisely because what you saw against Auburn; he can throw the deep ball and spread the defense. With JG, it at least improves the odds for our run game. Against Chryst, it becomes easier for defenses to simply shut down the run. If we had Stanford's offensive line, it would be a different story, but we don't. Therefore, I think JG gives us a better shot at winning, and we saw that versus Auburn.
But it's absolutely true that JG needs to read defenses better to be elite. It's also true that he had crappy QB coaching for most of his early career here, so he might continue to improve rapidly.
well, let's face it we do have a QB situation worth talking about...nothing wrong with that...yes, JG does throw a nice longer ball...yes, he does hold it a second too long...Keller throws a better short ball and gets rid of it faster...Manning had a better O-line to throw behind...short or long...
GO VOLS!