SpaceCoastVol
Jacked up on moonshine and testosterone
- Joined
- Sep 10, 2009
- Messages
- 51,052
- Likes
- 62,724
Hold on. You are saying the 'noise' is annoying and not the fact that one (islamic call to prayer) is definitely religious intrusion and the other (church bells playing non religious music) might be? I agree. I want all those car stereos blasting hip hop to be ticketed as well... I find that shizz very annoyingDifferent how? Far as I'm concerned, they are both equally annoying noises. Because one has words? In a language you don't understand? Is that the difference?
Help me understand here.
They're both noise, and they're both intrusive.Hold on. You are saying the 'noise' is annoying and not the fact that one (islamic call to prayer) is definitely religious intrusion and the other (church bells playing non religious music) might be? I agree. I want all those car stereos blasting hip hop to be ticketed as well... I find that shizz very annoying
That's a dodge of the religious part of the question though. It is possible for church bells to play a non religious song. It is IMpossible for an islamic call to prayer to be non religious. You don't like the 'noise'. That is not really relevant to the argument. I don't like loud motorcycle pipes, or crap 'music' blasting from the car next to me. And while we are at it, smokers blowing smoke anywhere near me is intrusive and offensive. However, we are discussing the religious intrusion of church bells vs 'praying?' over loudspeakers.They're both noise, and they're both intrusive.
That's a dodge of the religious part of the question though. It is possible for church bells to play a non religious song. It is IMpossible for an islamic call to prayer to be non religious. You don't like the 'noise'. That is not really relevant to the argument. I don't like loud motorcycle pipes, or crap 'music' blasting from the car next to me. And while we are at it, smokers blowing smoke anywhere near me is intrusive and offensive. However, we are discussing the religious intrusion of church bells vs 'praying?' over loudspeakers.
Well, you just nullified the point you were trying to make in the first paragraph with the opening lines of the second paragraph. Not all Muslims are going to react with violence over an NEA exhibition.
How about praying at the busy DFW airport where people have to catch their next plane out to NYC.
View attachment 219624
Hey we got Capone for income tax evasion. Maybe we can get the calls to prayer under noise ordinances.When church bells start to bellow out their rendition of Hooked on a Feeling, you'll have an argument, but church bells are labeled as such for a reason. They aren't and never will be secular.
So, as much as you detest Islam, the call to prayer is protected under freedom of religion just as church bells are
Church bells are pleasing music. Call to prayer is annoying noise... to me. I know it bothers your satanic worship group, so YOU might want to file that complaint.
And stop taking this so seriously.
Whereas Christianity was founded on the teachings of a decent person but out of which came the Crusades, The Inquisition and systematic pedophilia. It is not possible to estimate the death and maiming totals. Except for the pedophilia we thankfully seem to be in a lull at the moment. I believe that is only because Christian leaders today do not have political and military power as they did in centuries past.Islam is the only major religion that it's founder was a violent, slaver, rapist and pedophile who brutally murdered hundreds of thousands of people.. I am pretty sure that is the difference