85SugarVol
I prefer the tumult of Liberty
- Joined
- Jan 17, 2010
- Messages
- 31,915
- Likes
- 62,530
Except I don't think we should be the world's arms dealer. This isn't just for Israel it's for everyone. For example, I don't think we should arm the Saudis to just commit atrocities in YemenIt’s anti capitalist at a minimum. Why wouldn’t we sell arms to Israel?
The implication of such a move is “Israel is doing something wrong”. So yes, it would appear to be anti Israel move
Prohibiting arms sales would simply drive up costs for us - the bill due just gets bigger.Except I don't think we should be the world's arms dealer. This isn't just for Israel it's for everyone. I don't think we should arm the Saudis to just commit atrocities in Yemen
We cause more death worldwide than any other country in the world
Except I don't think we should be the world's arms dealer. This isn't just for Israel it's for everyone. For example, I don't think we should arm the Saudis to just commit atrocities in Yemen
We cause more death worldwide than any other country in the world. Let's take a time out
Drive up what costs? The cost to make war around the world? More costly to outfit and maintain 800 military bases around the world? The bill only goes up if you buy the same amount or more. Buy less, save moneyProhibiting arms sales would simply drive up costs for us - the bill due just gets bigger.
That doesn’t sound like you.
Our procurement cost.Drive up what costs? The cost to make war around the world? More costly to outfit and maintain 800 military bases around the world? The bill only goes up if you buy the same amount or more. Buy less, save money
The should be isn't attainable given Israel's recent and current slaughter of women, children and other noncombatants, making Gaza uninabitable, and aggressions in the West Bank. It's too bad they chose to use the attacks as a pretext to further displace Palestinians and grab more land instead of addressing the root causes of the attacks.Fair enough. With that in mind, what do you think should be the realistic outcome of this conflict? And I don't mean "women and children should stop being killed." That's a platitude. We all agree on that.
Again, only if we feel the need to load up on their products. Do we need to put can we cut way back, eliminate some waste and actually figure out what is necessaryOur procurement cost.
The price we pay to Lockheed is reduced, due to their ability to make external sales to others.
Cut those sales off to Lockheed - our price goes up.
It would be great if we cut back on bloated defense spending - you and I both know that’s not happening.Again, only if we feel the need to load up on their products. Do we need to put can we cut way back, eliminate some waste and actually figure out what is necessary
How do so these other countries get away with spending so much less on defense? Maybe we should figure that out
Which country spending less are you wanting to imitate?Again, only if we feel the need to load up on their products. Do we need to put can we cut way back, eliminate some waste and actually figure out what is necessary
How do so these other countries get away with spending so much less on defense? Maybe we should figure that out
Flash in the pan? He's served many terms since the mid-90s and had been involved in policy since the 80s.I'm aware of bad faith agreements and actions from both sides going back decades.
Netanyahu is a flash in the pan. Much like our American system agreements and living up to them in good faith can be challenging because we turn over leadership so often......a blessing and a curse.
On the Palestinian side it's equally difficult, not everyone is on board, multiple factions willing to drag the other for power and influence etc.
Agree completely with the MIC, but that will never happen until we blow the current status quo up, even if we did blow it up I think they would gladly bulldoze us....... Basically we are screwed.
The longest serving Prime Minister in Israel's history by a wide margin is hardly a flash in the pan though.I'm aware of bad faith agreements and actions from both sides going back decades.
Netanyahu is a flash in the pan. Much like our American system agreements and living up to them in good faith can be challenging because we turn over leadership so often......a blessing and a curse.
On the Palestinian side it's equally difficult, not everyone is on board, multiple factions willing to drag the other for power and influence etc.
Agree completely with the MIC, but that will never happen until we blow the current status quo up, even if we did blow it up I think they would gladly bulldoze us....... Basically we are screwed.
But my stance and my stated goals don't accept that. It's why I don't support these bought and paid for politicians. I don't want my kids to be sacrificed to the MIC just because I had to accept they couldn't dare to cut spendingIt would be great if we cut back on bloated defense spending - you and I both know that’s not happening.
So if we accept that our purchases remain constant (at best), and external sales are prohibited - our per unit procurement cost only goes up.
The bloat and waste in our system is outrageous.Let's start with any. The outright waste in our system could fund the budget of most countries combined. But you have to spend money to save money right?