Israel vs Palestinians

#26,576
#26,576
EasternVol said:
Today probably they are. That's where the threat is. If they had them during Saddam's reign some would be pointed at Baghdad.
Click to expand...
In this alternate timeline from 30 years ago where Iran was enriching uranium towards a weapon?

Sure, they might have pointed a few in Saddam’s direction.

In this actual timeline from today where Iran is enriching uranium towards a weapon?

They all point at Israel.

Not that that should have the Jews all jumpy.
 
#26,577
#26,577
85SugarVol said:
In this alternate timeline from 30 years ago where Iran was enriching uranium towards a weapon?

Sure, they might have pointed a few in Saddam’s direction.

In this actual timeline from today where Iran is enriching uranium towards a weapon?

They all point at Israel.

Not that that should have the Jews all jumpy.
Click to expand...
You'll notice i wrote 'if'. It's not an alternative timeline so there's no need to be so dramatic.
Israel's got a lot more warheads than Iran will have in the foreseeable future and both sides know it. So Israel shouldn't be all jumpy. But Bibi likes to play the suckers for maximum effect.
 
#26,578
#26,578
EasternVol said:
You'll notice i wrote 'if'. It's not an alternative timeline so there's no need to be so dramatic.
Israel's got a lot more warheads than Iran will have in the foreseeable future and both sides know it. So Israel shouldn't be all jumpy. But Bibi likes to play the suckers for maximum effect.
Click to expand...
They do have many more, and to a certain extent I agree, but never under estimate religious zealots.
 
#26,579
#26,579
EasternVol said:
You'll notice i wrote 'if'. It's not an alternative timeline so there's no need to be so dramatic.
Israel's got a lot more warheads than Iran will have in the foreseeable future and both sides know it. So Israel shouldn't be all jumpy. But Bibi likes to play the suckers for maximum effect.
Click to expand...
Yes, you proposed a hypothetical - an alternative timeline where Iran possesses nuclear weapons 30 years ago. No need to be so defensive.

So you’re saying Iran will have warheads in the foreseeable future? No wonder the Jews are jumpy…
 
#26,581
#26,581
85SugarVol said:
Yes, you proposed a hypothetical - an alternative timeline where Iran possesses nuclear weapons 30 years ago. No need to be so defensive.

So you’re saying Iran will have warheads in the foreseeable future? No wonder the Jews are jumpy…
Click to expand...
No, I'm not saying they will have warheads. Maybe they will and maybe they won't. Israel has far more than 0 and far more than 20.
 
#26,582
#26,582
EasternVol said:
You'll notice i wrote 'if'. It's not an alternative timeline so there's no need to be so dramatic.
Israel's got a lot more warheads than Iran will have in the foreseeable future and both sides know it. So Israel shouldn't be all jumpy. But Bibi likes to play the suckers for maximum effect.
Click to expand...
Has Israel called for the end of Iran?
 
  • Like
Reactions: SpaceCoastVol, Orangeslice13, InVOLuntary and 1 other person
#26,583
#26,583
EasternVol said:
No, I'm not saying they will have warheads. Maybe they will and maybe they won't. Israel has far more than 0 and far more than 20.
Click to expand...
Not sure how many Israel has, definitely more than 0 though.

Iran is trying their damndest to field one. How close they are is a matter of speculation.

I’m betting they don’t field one though. Those pesky Jews won’t let them.
 
  • Like
Reactions: norrislakevol and marcusluvsvols
#26,584
#26,584
85SugarVol said:
Not sure how many Israel has, definitely more than 0 though.

Iran is trying their damndest to field one. How close they are is a matter of speculation.

I’m betting they don’t field one though. Those pesky Jews won’t let them.
Click to expand...
imagine if Iran had them and Israel didnt..now who is responsibly restrained?
 
  • Like
Reactions: norrislakevol
#26,589
#26,589
#26,593
#26,593
EasternVol said:
Your lack of reading comprehension is your problem. I cited why the UN said they fired the workers, which is confirmed by the article I linked.
Click to expand...
Israel accused up to almost 10% of the workers to helping Hamas (thats over 200 workers). They didn't just randomly pick out 21 to fire. That doesn't make sense. They had evidence to let go who they let go. It was a horrible look for the UN to have to do that. They are not going to do that willy nilly. The article I provided you clearly says they had evidence. You can deny that all you want. Denial is your problem, Sis.
 
#26,595
#26,595
jp1 said:
Israel accused up to almost 10% of the workers to helping Hamas (thats over 200 workers). They didn't just randomly pick out 21 to fire. That doesn't make sense. They had evidence to let go who they let go. It was a horrible look for the UN to have to do that. They are not going to do that willy nilly. The article I provided you clearly says they had evidence. You can deny that all you want. Denial is your problem, Sis.
Click to expand...
Do you see how you're trying to move the goalposts?
 
#26,597
#26,597
  • Like
Reactions: marcusluvsvols and just bob
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top